Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles in a Microreactor

Wagner, J., Köhler, J. M.·2005·Nano Letters

Abstract

A continuous flow microreactor was used for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles (5 to 50 nm) directly from a gold salt (HAuCl(4)) and a reducing agent (ascorbic acid). Experimental parameters were optimized to obtain narrow size distributions, which were at average two times narrower than those obtained in a conventional synthesis. Additionally, two approaches, i.e., elevation of pH during reaction and hydrophobization of internal reactor surfaces were tested to suppress reactor fouling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl050097t

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, J., & Köhler, J. M.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2005-03-16
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
685-691
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2064001403
Cited by
385
References
1
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.