Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coupling of Optical Resonances in a Compositionally Asymmetric Plasmonic Nanoparticle Dimer

Sheikholeslami, Sassan, Jun, Young-wook, Jain, Prashant K., Alivisatos, A. Paul·2010·Nano Letters

Abstract

Electromagnetic coupling between plasmon resonant nanoparticles follows principles of molecular hybridization, that is, particle plasmons hybridize to form a lower energy bonding plasmon mode and a higher energy antibonding plasmon mode. For coupling between equivalent particles (homodimer), the in-phase mode is optically allowed, whereas the out-of-phase mode is dark due to the cancellation of the equivalent dipole moments. We probe, using polarized scattering spectroscopy, the coupling in a pair of nonequivalent particles (silver/gold nanoparticle heterodimer) that allows us to observe both in-phase and out-of-phase plasmon modes. The hybridization model postulates that the bonding modes should be red shifted with respect to the gold particle plasmon resonance and the antibonding modes blue shifted with respect to the silver particle plasmon resonance. In practice, the antibonding modes are red shifted with respect to the silver plasmon resonance. This anomalous shift is due to the coupling of the silver particle plasmon resonance to the quasi-continuum of interband transitions in gold, which dominate in the spectral region of the silver particle plasmon resonance. The hybridization model, which considers only free-electron behavior of the metals, fails to account for this coupling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl101380f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Sheikholeslami, S., Jun, Y.-W., Jain, P. K., & Alivisatos, A. P.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2010-06-10
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
2655-2660
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2014940218
Cited by
402
References
1
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.