Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity via Controllable Dealloying: A Model Study of Ordered Cu3Pt/C Intermetallic Nanocatalysts

Wang, Deli, Yu, Yingchao, Xin, Huolin L., Hovden, Robert, Ercius, Peter, Mundy, Julia A., Chen, Hao, Richard, Jonah H., Muller, David A., DiSalvo, Francis J., Abruña, Héctor D.·2012·Nano Letters
DOI 10.1021/nl302404g
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A promising electrocatalyst prototype of low Pt mole fraction, intermetallic nanoparticles of Cu(3)Pt, has been prepared using a simple impregnation-reduction method, followed by a post heat-treatment. Two dealloying methods (electrochemical and chemical) were implemented to control the atomic-level morphology and improve performance for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The morphology and elemental composition of the dealloyed nanoparticles were characterized at angstrom resolution using an aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope equipped with an electron energy loss spectrometer. We found that the electrochemical dealloying method led to the formation of a thin Pt skin of ca. 1 nm in thickness with an ordered Cu(3)Pt core structure, while chemical leaching gave rise to a "spongy" structure with no ordered structure being preserved. A three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction indicated that numerous voids were formed in the chemically dealloyed nanoparticles. Both dealloying methods yielded enhanced specific and mass activities toward the ORR and higher stability relative to Pt/C. The spongy nanoparticles exhibited better mass activity with a slightly lower specific activity than the electrochemically dealloyed nanoparticles after 50 potential cycles. In both cases, the mass activity was still enhanced after 5000 potential cycles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl302404g

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Wu J., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 4984, 10.1021/ja100571h · DOI · Paper page
  2. Sasaki K., 2008, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155, B180, 10.1149/1.2816238 · DOI
  3. Yu Y. X., 2011, Nano Lett.
  4. Markovic N. M., 2002, Surf. Sci. Rep., 45, 121
  5. Mukerjee S., 1995, J. Phys. Chem., 99, 4577, 10.1021/j100013a032 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cueva P., 2012, Microsc. Microanal.

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Yu, Y., Xin, H. L., Hovden, R., Ercius, P., Mundy, J. A., Chen, H., Richard, J. H., Muller, D. A., DiSalvo, F. J., & Abruña, H. D.
Venue
Nano Letters
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2012-09-10
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
5230-5238
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
DOI
10.1021/nl302404g
OpenAlex
W2023500763
Cited by
310
References
39
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.