The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanostructured Li2S–C Composites as Cathode Material for High-Energy Lithium/Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
With a theoretical capacity of 1166 mA·h·g(-1), lithium sulfide (Li(2)S) has received much attention as a promising cathode material for high specific energy lithium/sulfur cells. However, the insulating nature of Li(2)S prevents the achievement of high utilization (or high capacity) and good rate capability. Various efforts have been made to ameliorate this problem by improving the contact between Li(2)S and electronic conductors. In the literature, however, a relatively high capacity was only obtained with the Li(2)S content below 50 wt %; therefore, the estimated cell specific energy values are often below 350 W·h·kg(-1), which is insufficient to meet the ever-increasing requirements of newly emerging technologies. Here, we report a cost-effective way of preparing nanostructured Li(2)S-carbon composite cathodes by high-energy dry ball milling of commercially available micrometer-sized Li(2)S powder together with carbon additives. A simple but effective electrochemical activation process was used to dramatically improve the utilization and reversibility of the Li(2)S-C electrodes, which was confirmed by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. We further improved the cycling stability of the Li(2)S-C electrodes by adding multiwalled carbon nanotubes to the nanocomposites. With a very high specific capacity of 1144 mA·h·g(-1) (98% of the theoretical value) obtained at a high Li(2)S content (67.5 wt %), the estimated specific energy of our cell was ∼610 W·h·kg(-1), which is the highest demonstrated so far for the Li/Li(2)S cells. The cells also maintained good rate capability and improved cycle life. With further improvement in capacity retention, nanostructured Li(2)S-C composite cathodes may offer a significant opportunity for the development of rechargeable cells with a much higher specific energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries
Adelhelm, P., Hartmann, P., Bender, C. L., Busche, M., Eufinger, C., & Janek, J. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.105 · Cited by 478
Xiong, S., Xie, K., Diao, Y., & Hong, X. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.041 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, K., Song, M.-K., Cairns, E. J., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6474-6479
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2329733896
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanostructured Li2S–C Composites as Cathode Material for High-Energy Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nl303965a
- The paper
- Cai, K., Song, M.-K., Cairns, E. J., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Nanostructured Li2S–C Composites as Cathode Material for High-Energy Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl303965a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.