The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing the Bonding and Electronic Structure of Single Atom Dopants in Graphene with Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy
Abstract
A combination of scanning transmission electron microscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy, and ab initio calculations reveal striking electronic structure differences between two distinct single substitutional Si defect geometries in graphene. Optimised acquisition conditions allow for exceptional signal-to-noise levels in the spectroscopic data. The near-edge fine structure can be compared with great accuracy to simulations and reveal either an sp(3)-like configuration for a trivalent Si or a more complicated hybridized structure for a tetravalent Si impurity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
Cited by
Nitrogen-doped carbon materials
Inagaki, M., Toyoda, M., Soneda, Y., & Morishita, T. (2018) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.024 · Cited by 867
Atomic electron tomography: 3D structures without crystals
Miao, J., Ercius, P., & Billinge, S. J. L. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2157 · Cited by 319
Control of Radiation Damage in MoS2 by Graphene Encapsulation
Zan, R., Ramasse, Q. M., Jalil, R., Georgiou, T., Bangert, U., & Novoselov, K. S. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4044035 · Cited by 286
Self-citationKe, X., Bittencourt, C., & Van Tendeloo, G. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.158 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramasse, Q. M., Seabourne, C. R., Kepaptsoglou, D.-M., Zan, R., Bangert, U., & Scott, A. J.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-01-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4989-4995
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W1986909172
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
