Cited by 867Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionGraphene research and applicationsSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

Nitrogen-doped carbon materials

Inagaki, Michio, Toyoda, Masahiro, Soneda, Yasushi, Morishita, Takahiro·2018·Carbon

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.024

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inagaki, M., Toyoda, M., Soneda, Y., & Morishita, T.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Oita University (JP)
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
  • TOYO Tanso Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Inagaki, Michio
Venue
Carbon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
132
Pages
104-140
ISSN
0008-6223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792104138
Cited by
867
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 23
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Carbon (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
nitrogen-doped carbon, graphene, carbon nanotubes, carbon fiber, porous carbon, carbon black, n-type doping, fuel cells, lithium-sulfur batteries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review