The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local Atomic and Electronic Structure of Boron Chemical Doping in Monolayer Graphene
Abstract
We use scanning tunneling microscopy and X-ray spectroscopy to characterize the atomic and electronic structure of boron-doped and nitrogen-doped graphene created by chemical vapor deposition on copper substrates. Microscopic measurements show that boron, like nitrogen, incorporates into the carbon lattice primarily in the graphitic form and contributes ~0.5 carriers into the graphene sheet per dopant. Density functional theory calculations indicate that boron dopants interact strongly with the underlying copper substrate while nitrogen dopants do not. The local bonding differences between graphitic boron and nitrogen dopants lead to large scale differences in dopant distribution. The distribution of dopants is observed to be completely random in the case of boron, while nitrogen displays strong sublattice clustering. Structurally, nitrogen-doped graphene is relatively defect-free while boron-doped graphene films show a large number of Stone-Wales defects. These defects create local electronic resonances and cause electronic scattering, but do not electronically dope the graphene film.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Wang, H., Maiyalagan, T., & Wang, X. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200652y · Cited by 3,618
Electronic properties of disordered two-dimensional carbon
Peres, N. M. R., Guinea, F., & Castro Neto, A. H. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.125411 · Cited by 1,445
Quantum interference and Klein tunnelling in graphene heterojunctions
Young, A. F., & Kim, P. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1198 · Cited by 1,183
Connecting Dopant Bond Type with Electronic Structure in N-Doped Graphene
Schiros, T., Nordlund, D., Pálová, L., Prezzi, D., Zhao, L., Kim, K. S., Wurstbauer, U., Gutiérrez, C., Delongchamp, D., Jaye, C., et al. (2012) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl301409h · Cited by 540
Self-citation
Cited by
Nitrogen-doped carbon materials
Inagaki, M., Toyoda, M., Soneda, Y., & Morishita, T. (2018) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.024 · Cited by 867
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, L., Levendorf, M., Goncher, S., Schiros, T., Pálová, L., Zabet-Khosousi, A., Rim, K. T., Gutiérrez, C., Nordlund, D., Jaye, C., Hybertsen, M., Reichman, D., Flynn, G. W., Park, J., & Pasupathy, A. N.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4659-4665
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2316854365
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.