Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First Evidence of Manganese–Nickel Segregation and Densification upon Cycling in Li-Rich Layered Oxides for Lithium Batteries

Boulineau, Adrien, Simonin, Loïc, Colin, Jean-François, Bourbon, Carole, Patoux, Sébastien·2013·Nano Letters

Abstract

Lithium-rich manganese-based layered oxides Li[Li(x)Mn(y)TM(1-x-y)]O2 with TM standing for Ni, Co, or Fe are of great interest as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Indeed, among all of the materials, they offer the highest rechargeable capacity and energy density. However, when used, they suffer from complex evolutions that need to be understood before their practical use. Here we report on such evolutions studied using advanced transmission electron microscopy. Structural modifications are directly observed at the atomic scale using Cs corrected STEM HAADF imaging technique, and the chemical modifications are probed by the means of STEM EELS experiments. For the first time, segregation between nickel and manganese close the particle surface is pointed out. Finally, observed evolutions are correlated within a proposed mechanism that leads to the densification of the material. Our results allow understanding the link between the decrease of electrochemical performance and these evolutions occurring into the material upon cycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl4019275

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Boulineau, A., Simonin, L., Colin, J.-F., Bourbon, C., & Patoux, S.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2013-07-31
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
3857-3863
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2319146961
Cited by
467
References
1
FWCI
25.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.