Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organic Li4C8H2O6 Nanosheets for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Wang, Shiwen, Wang, Lijiang, Zhang, Kai, Zhu, Zhiqiang, Tao, Zhanliang, Chen, Jun·2013·Nano Letters

Abstract

Organic tetralithium salts of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid (Li4C8H2O6) with the morphologies of bulk, nanoparticles, and nanosheets have been investigated as the active materials of either positive or negative electrode of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. It is demonstrated that, in the electrolyte of LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC), reversible two-Li-ion electrochemical reactions are taking place with redox Li4C8H2O6/Li2C8H2O6 at ~2.6 V for a positive electrode and Li4C8H2O6/Li6C8H2O6 at ~0.8 V for a negative electrode, respectively. In the observed system, the electrochemical performance of high to low order is nanosheets > nanoparticles > bulk. Remarkably, Li4C8H2O6 nanosheets show the discharge capacities of 223 and 145 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 and 5 C rates, respectively. A capacity retention of 95% is sustained after 50 cycles at 0.1 C rate charge/discharge and room temperature. Moreover, charging the symmetrical cells with Li4C8H2O6 nanosheets as the initial active materials of both positive and negative electrodes produces all-organic LIBs with an average operation voltage of 1.8 V and an energy density of about 130 Wh kg(-1), enlightening the design and application of organic Li-reservoir compounds with nanostructures for all organic LIBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl402239p

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Wang, L., Zhang, K., Zhu, Z., Tao, Z., & Chen, J.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2013-09-03
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
4404-4409
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2417320135
Cited by
398
References
20
FWCI
21.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.