Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 162 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A chemistry and material perspective on lithium redox flow batteries towards high-density electrical energy storage

Open access
Zhao, Yu, Ding, Yu, Li, Yutao, Peng, Lele, Byon, Hye Ryung, Goodenough, John B., Yu, Guihua·2015·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

This review summarizes the latest advances and challenges from a chemistry and material perspective on Li-redox flow batteries that combine the synergistic features of Li-ion batteries and redox flow batteries towards large-scale high-density energy storage systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5cs00289c

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 162 references

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Li, Y., Peng, L., Byon, H. R., Goodenough, J. B., & Yu, G.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2015
Volume
44
Issue
22
Pages
7968-7996
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W1856003333
Cited by
458
References
162
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A chemistry and material perspective on lithium redox flow batteries towards high-density electrical energy storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5cs00289c
The paper
Zhao, Y., Ding, Y., Li, Y., Peng, L., Byon, H. R., Goodenough, J. B., & Yu, G. (2015). A chemistry and material perspective on lithium redox flow batteries towards high-density electrical energy storage. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00289c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.