Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 806

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Unusual Mechanism of Partial Fermi Level Pinning at Metal–MoS2 Interfaces

Gong, Cheng, Colombo, Luigi, Wallace, Robert M., Cho, Kyeongjae·2014·Nano Letters

Abstract

Density functional theory calculations are performed to unravel the nature of the contact between metal electrodes and monolayer MoS2. Schottky barriers are shown to be present for a variety of metals with the work functions spanning over 4.2-6.1 eV. Except for the p-type Schottky contact with platinum, the Fermi levels in all of the studied metal-MoS2 complexes are situated above the midgap of MoS2. The mechanism of the Fermi level pinning at metal-MoS2 contact is shown to be unique for metal-2D-semiconductor interfaces, remarkably different from the well-known Bardeen pinning effect, metal-induced gap states, and defect/disorder induced gap states, which are applicable to traditional metal-semiconductor junctions. At metal-MoS2 interfaces, the Fermi level is partially pinned as a result of two interface behaviors: first by a metal work function modification by interface dipole formation due to the charge redistribution, and second by the production of gap states mainly of Mo d-orbitals character by the weakened intralayer S-Mo bonding due to the interface metal-S interaction. This finding would provide guidance to develop approaches to form Ohmic contact to MoS2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl403465v

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 806

Metadata

Authors
Gong, C., Colombo, L., Wallace, R. M., & Cho, K.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2014-03-27
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
1714-1720
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2333187132
Cited by
806
References
1
FWCI
29.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.