The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen-Doped ZnO Nanowire Arrays for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting
Abstract
We report the rational synthesis of nitrogen-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:N) nanowire arrays, and their implementation as photoanodes in photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells for hydrogen generation from water splitting. Dense and vertically aligned ZnO nanowires were first prepared from a hydrothermal method, followed by annealing in ammonia to incorporate N as a dopant. Nanowires with a controlled N concentration (atomic ratio of N to Zn) up to approximately 4% were prepared by varying the annealing time. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies confirm N substitution at O sites in ZnO nanowires up to approximately 4%. Incident-photon-to-current-efficiency measurements carried out on PEC cell with ZnO:N nanowire arrays as photoanodes demonstrate a significant increase of photoresponse in the visible region compared to undoped ZnO nanowires prepared at similar conditions. Mott-Schottky measurements on a representative 3.7% ZnO:N sample give a flat-band potential of -0.58 V, a carrier density of approximately 4.6 x 10(18) cm(-3), and a space-charge layer of approximately 22 nm. Upon illumination at a power density of 100 mW/cm(2) (AM 1.5), water splitting is observed in both ZnO and ZnO:N nanowires. In comparison to ZnO nanowires without N-doping, ZnO:N nanowires show an order of magnitude increase in photocurrent density with photo-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 0.15% at an applied potential of +0.5 V (versus Ag/AgCl). These results suggest substantial potential of metal oxide nanowire arrays with controlled doping in PEC water splitting applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Cited by
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting
Li, X., Yu, J., Low, J., Fang, Y., Xiao, J., & Chen, X. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c4ta04461d · Cited by 1,888
One-dimensional ZnO nanostructures: Solution growth and functional properties
Xu, S., & Wang, Z. L. (2011) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-011-0160-7 · Cited by 1,361
Nanotechnology‐Enabled Energy Harvesting for Self‐Powered Micro‐/Nanosystems
Wang, Z. L., & Wu, W. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201201656 · Cited by 1,063
Crystal Facet Engineering of Photoelectrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting
Wang, S., Liu, G., & Wang, L. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00584 · Cited by 847
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, X., Wolcott, A., Wang, G., Sobo, A., Fitzmorris, R. C., Qian, F., Zhang, J. Z., & Li, Y.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-18
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2331-2336
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2158255246
- Cited by
- 1,164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.