The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple, Rapid, Sensitive, and Versatile SWNT−Paper Sensor for Environmental Toxin Detection Competitive with ELISA
Open accessAbstract
Safety of water was for a long time and still is one of the most pressing needs for many countries and different communities. Despite the fact that there are potentially many methods to evaluate water safety, finding a simple, rapid, versatile, and inexpensive method for detection of toxins in everyday items is still a great challenge. In this study, we extend the concept of composites, impregnated porous fibrous materials, such as fabrics and papers, by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), toward very simple but high-performance biosensors. They utilize the strong dependence of electrical conductivity through nanotubes percolation network on the width of nanotube-nanotube tunneling gap and can potentially satisfy all the requirements outlined above for the routine toxin monitoring. An antibody to the microcystin-LR (MC-LR), one of the common culprits in mass poisonings, was dispersed together with SWNTs. This dispersion was used to dip-coat the paper rendering it conductive. The change in conductivity of the paper was used to sense the MC-LR in the water rapidly and accurately. The method has the linear detection range up to 10 nmol/L and nonlinear detection up to 40 nmol/L. The limit of detection was found to be 0.6 nmol/L (0.6 ng/mL), which satisfies the strictest World Health Organization standard for MC-LR content in drinking water (1 ng/mL) and is comparable to the detection limit of the traditional ELISA method of MC-LR detection, while drastically reducing the time of analysis by more than an order of magnitude, which is one of the major hurdles in practical applications. Similar technology of sensor preparation can also be used for a variety of other rapid environmental sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodal optical sensing and analyte specificity using single-walled carbon nanotubes
Heller, D. A., Jin, H., Martinez, B. M., Patel, D., Miller, B. M., Yeung, T.-K., Jena, P. V., Höbartner, C., Ha, T., Silverman, S. K., et al. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.369 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Unexpected Chirality of Nanoparticle Dimers and Ultrasensitive Chiroplasmonic Bioanalysis
Wu, X., Xu, L., Liu, L., Ma, W., Yin, H., Kuang, H., Wang, L., Xu, C., & Kotov, N. A. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4095445 · Cited by 305
Self-citationInnovative detection methods for aquatic algal toxins and their presence in the food chain
Vilariño, N., Louzao, M. C., Fraga, M., Rodríguez, L. P., & Botana, L. M. (2013) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7108-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Chen, W., Xu, D., Shim, B. S., Zhu, Y., Sun, F., Liu, L., Peng, C., Jin, Z., Xu, C., & Kotov, N. A.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-11-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4147-4152
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2052931719
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.