Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Perspectives on Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Raman Spectroscopy

Dresselhaus, Mildred S., Jorio, Ado, Hofmann, Mario, Dresselhaus, Gene, Saito, Riichiro·2010·Nano Letters

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is here shown to provide a powerful tool to differentiate between two different sp(2) carbon nanostructures (carbon nanotubes and graphene) which have many properties in common and others that differ. Emphasis is given to the richness of both carbon nanostructures as prototype examples of nanostructured materials. A glimpse toward future developments in this field is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl904286r

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,254

Metadata

Authors
Dresselhaus, M. S., Jorio, A., Hofmann, M., Dresselhaus, G., & Saito, R.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2010-01-19
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
751-758
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2078119700
Cited by
3,254
References
0
FWCI
84.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Raman Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nl904286r
The paper
Dresselhaus, M. S., Jorio, A., Hofmann, M., Dresselhaus, G., & Saito, R. (2010). Perspectives on Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl904286r

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.