Cited by 652CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Achieving Highly Efficient, Selective, and Stable CO2 Reduction on Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes

Wu, Jingjie, Yadav, Ram Manohar, Liu, Mingjie, Sharma, Pranav P., Tiwary, Chandra Sekhar, Ma, Lulu, Zou, Xiaolong, Zhou, Xiao-Dong +3 more·2015·ACS Nano

Abstract

The challenge in the electrosynthesis of fuels from CO2 is to achieve durable and active performance with cost-effective catalysts. Here, we report that carbon nanotubes (CNTs), doped with nitrogen to form resident electron-rich defects, can act as highly efficient and, more importantly, stable catalysts for the conversion of CO2 to CO. The unprecedented overpotential (-0.18 V) and selectivity (80%) observed on nitrogen-doped CNTs (NCNTs) are attributed to their unique features to facilitate the reaction, including (i) high electrical conductivity, (ii) preferable catalytic sites (pyridinic N defects), and (iii) low free energy for CO2 activation and high barrier for hydrogen evolution. Indeed, DFT calculations show a low free energy barrier for the potential-limiting step to form key intermediate COOH as well as strong binding energy of adsorbed COOH and weak binding energy for the adsorbed CO. The highest selective site toward CO production is pyridinic N, and the NCNT-based electrodes exhibit no degradation over 10 h of continuous operation, suggesting the structural stability of the electrode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsnano.5b01079

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Yadav, R. M., Liu, M., Sharma, P. P., Tiwary, C. S., Ma, L., Zou, X., Zhou, X.-D., Yakobson, B. I., Lou, J., & Ajayan, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Xiao-Dong
  • Lou, Jun
  • Ajayan, Pulickel M.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
5364-5371
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W1966763428
Cited by
652
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 11
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University Grants Commission
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0035, FA9550-14-1-0268)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
CO2 reduction, nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes, electrocatalysis, co-production, COOH intermediate, hydrogen evolution suppression, catalyst stability, overpotential, adsorption energy, DFT calculations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review