The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular Uptake, Cytotoxicity, and Innate Immune Response of Silica−Titania Hollow Nanoparticles Based on Size and Surface Functionality
Abstract
Silica-titania hollow nanoparticles (HNPs) with uniform diameters of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 nm were fabricated by dissolution and redeposition method in order to evaluate size dependent cellular response. Surface-modified HNPs with cationic, anionic, and neutral functional group were prepared by silane treatment. We systematically investigated cellular internalization, toxicity, and innate immune response of HNPs in human breast cancer (SK-BR-3) and mouse alveolar macrophage (J774A.1) cells. Size- and surface functionality-dependent cellular uptake of HNPs was investigated by fluorescence labeling (fluorescein isothiocyanate), inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy, and ultrastructural resolution using transmission electron microscopy. Viability, reactive oxygen species, and apoptosis/necrosis of HNP-treated J774A.1 revealed the size-dependent phenomenon. Innate immune response of HNP-treated macrophages was measured by three cytokines such as interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor α. Among the HNPs of different sizes, 50-nm HNPs demonstrated the highest toxic influence on macrophages. Among the HNPs with surface functionalities, cationic HNPs demonstrated the most toxic effect on J774A.1 and the highest uptake efficiency. The toxicity results of HNP-treated macrophages were consistent with the cellular internalization efficiency. These findings provide size- and surface functionality-dependent nanotoxicity and uptake of HNPs, and lead to HNPs for bioapplications such as drug delivery and imaging probe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., & Biswas, P. (2009) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 · Cited by 1,713
Xia, T., Kovochich, M., Liong, M., Meng, H., Kabehie, S., George, S., Zink, J. I., & Nel, A. E. (2009) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn900918w · Cited by 933
Cited by
Pharmacokinetic aspects of retinal drug delivery
del Amo, E. M., Rimpelä, A.-K., Heikkinen, E., Kari, O. K., Ramsay, E., Lajunen, T., Schmitt, M., Pelkonen, L., Bhattacharya, M., Richardson, D., et al. (2017) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.001 · Cited by 693
Recent Advances in Cell Membrane–Camouflaged Nanoparticles for Cancer Phototherapy
Zhen, X., Cheng, P., & Pu, K. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201804105 · Cited by 483
The Role of Surface Functionality in Determining Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity
Kim, S. T., Saha, K., Kim, C., & Rotello, V. M. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar3000647 · Cited by 403
Self-citationEffects of engineered nanoparticles on the innate immune system
Liu, Y., Hardie, J., Zhang, X., & Rotello, V. M. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.09.011 · Cited by 315
Secreted Biomolecules Alter the Biological Identity and Cellular Interactions of Nanoparticles
Albanese, A., Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4061012 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, W.-K., Kim, S., Choi, M., Kim, C., Jeong, Y. S., Cho, B.-R., Hahn, J.-S., & Jang, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5301-5313
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2081228873
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
