The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene Nanomesh by ZnO Nanorod Photocatalysts
Abstract
Local photodegradation of graphene oxide sheets at the tip of ZnO nanorods was used to achieve semiconducting graphene nanomeshes. The chemically exfoliated graphene oxide sheets, with a thickness of approximately 0.9 nm, were deposited on quartz substrates. Vertically aligned ZnO nanorod arrays with diameters of 140 nm and lengths of <1 microm were grown on a glass substrate by using a hydrothermal method. The graphene oxide sheets were physically attached to the tip of the ZnO nanorods by assembling the sheets on the nanorods. UV-assisted photodegradation of the graphene oxide sheets (with dimension of approximately 5x5 microm) at a contact place with the ZnO nanorods resulted in graphene nanomeshes with a pore size of approximately 200 nm. The graphene nanomeshes prepared by using the photocatalytic property of the ZnO nanorods contained smaller oxygen-containing carbonaceous bonds and higher defects as compared to the as-prepared graphene oxide sheets. When chemical reduction of the graphene nanomeshes by hydrazine was used, the oxygen bonds of the nanomeshes more decreased while their graphitization increased. Based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy at low binding energies, the graphene nanomeshes reduced by hydrazine exhibited as a broad sheet a p-type semiconductor with an approximately 1.2 eV energy gap between the valence band and the Fermi level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L., & Kim, P. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04235 · Cited by 13,435
Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes
Jiao, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07919 · Cited by 2,441
Coulomb Oscillations and Hall Effect in Quasi-2D Graphite Quantum Dots
Bunch, J. S., Yaish, Y., Brink, M., Bolotin, K., & McEuen, P. L. (2005) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl048111+ · Cited by 312
Cited by
Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15172j · Cited by 2,730
25th Anniversary Article: Hybrid Nanostructures Based on Two‐Dimensional Nanomaterials
Huang, X., Tan, C., Yin, Z., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201304964 · Cited by 632
Visible Photocatalytic Activity Enhancement of ZnWO4 by Graphene Hybridization
Bai, X., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs3005852 · Cited by 283
Lian, F., Cui, G., Liu, Z., Duo, L., Zhang, G., & Xing, B. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.043 · Cited by 252
Functional graphene nanomesh foam
Zhao, Y., Hu, C., Song, L., Wang, L., Shi, G., Dai, L., & Qu, L. (2014) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee00106k · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Akhavan, O.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-06-15
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4174-4180
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W1985122812
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 28.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.