The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Nanoparticle Size on Cellular Uptake and Liver MRI with Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
The effect of nanoparticle size (30-120 nm) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hepatic lesions in vivo has been systematically examined using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-coated iron oxide nanoparticles (PVP-IOs). Such biocompatible PVP-IOs with different sizes were synthesized by a simple one-pot pyrolysis method. These PVP-IOs exhibited good crystallinity and high T(2) relaxivities, and the relaxivity increased with the size of the magnetic nanoparticles. It was found that cellular uptake changed with both size and surface physiochemical properties, and that PVP-IO-37 with a core size of 37 nm and hydrodynamic particle size of 100 nm exhibited higher cellular uptake rate and greater distribution than other PVP-IOs and Feridex. We systematically investigated the effect of nanoparticle size on MRI of normal liver and hepatic lesions in vivo. The physical and chemical properties of the nanoparticles influenced their pharmacokinetic behavior, which ultimately determined their ability to accumulate in the liver. The contrast enhancement of PVP-IOs within the liver was highly dependent on the overall size of the nanoparticles, and the 100 nm PVP-IO-37 nanoparticles exhibited the greatest enhancement. These results will have implications in designing engineered nanoparticles that are optimized as MR contrast agents or for use in therapeutics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Tromsdorf, U. I., Bruns, O. T., Salmen, S. C., Beisiegel, U., & Weller, H. (2009) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl902715v · Cited by 396
Cited by
The Effect of Nanoparticle Size on In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Cellular Interaction
Hoshyar, N., Gray, S., Han, H., & Bao, G. (2016) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.16.5 · Cited by 1,990
Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters
Shang, L., Nienhaus, K., & Nienhaus, G. U. (2014) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-12-5 · Cited by 1,316
Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications
Dadfar, S. M., Roemhild, K., Drude, N. I., von Stillfried, S., Knüchel, R., Kiessling, F., & Lammers, T. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005 · Cited by 1,181
Canton, I., & Battaglia, G. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15309b · Cited by 936
Duan, X., & Li, Y. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201201390 · Cited by 926
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J., Bu, L., Xie, J., Chen, K., Cheng, Z., Li, X., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7151-7160
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W58295951
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Nanoparticle Size on Cellular Uptake and Liver MRI with Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn101643u
- The paper
- Huang, J., Bu, L., Xie, J., Chen, K., Cheng, Z., Li, X., & Chen, X. (2010). Effects of Nanoparticle Size on Cellular Uptake and Liver MRI with Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101643u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.