The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Workfunction-Tunable, N-Doped Reduced Graphene Transparent Electrodes for High-Performance Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes
Abstract
Graphene is a promising candidate to complement brittle and expensive transparent conducting oxides. Nevertheless, previous research efforts have paid little attention to reduced graphene, which can be of great benefit due to low-cost solution processing without substrate transfer. Here we demonstrate workfunction-tunable, highly conductive, N-doped reduced graphene film, which is obtainable from the spin-casting of graphene oxide dispersion and can be successfully employed as a transparent cathode for high-performance polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) as an alternative to fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO). The sheet resistance of N-doped reduced graphene attained 300 Ω/□ at 80% transmittance, one of the lowest values ever reported from the reduction of graphene oxide films. The optimal doping of quaternary nitrogen and the effective removal of oxygen functionalities via sequential hydrazine treatment and thermal reduction accomplished the low resistance. The PLEDs employing N-doped reduced graphene cathodes exhibited a maximum electroluminescence efficiency higher than those of FTO-based devices (4.0 cd/A for FTO and 7.0 cd/A for N-doped graphene at 17,000 cd/m(2)). The reduced barrier for electron injection from a workfunction-tunable, N-doped reduced graphene cathode offered this remarkable device performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene
Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., & Lau, C. N. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0731872 · Cited by 13,823
Cited by
Heteroatom-doped graphene materials: syntheses, properties and applications
Wang, X., Sun, G., Routh, P., Kim, D.-H., Huang, W., & Chen, P. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00141a · Cited by 1,891
Nitrogen-doped carbon materials
Inagaki, M., Toyoda, M., Soneda, Y., & Morishita, T. (2018) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.024 · Cited by 867
Han, J., Zhang, L. L., Lee, S., Oh, J., Lee, K.-S., Potts, J. R., Ji, J., Zhao, X., Ruoff, R. S., & Park, S. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn3034309 · Cited by 577
Self-citationLee, W. J., Maiti, U. N., Lee, J. M., Lim, J., Han, T. H., & Kim, S. O. (2014) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c4cc00146j · Cited by 484
Self-citationTransparent Flexible Graphene Triboelectric Nanogenerators
Kim, S., Gupta, M. K., Lee, K. Y., Sohn, A., Kim, T. Y., Shin, K., Kim, D., Kim, S. K., Lee, K. H., Shin, H., et al. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201400172 · Cited by 467
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, J. O., Park, J. S., Choi, D. S., Kim, J. Y., Lee, S. H., Lee, K. E., Kim, Y.-H., Song, M. H., Yoo, S., & Kim, S. O.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-167
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2107485045
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.