The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amine-Modified Graphene: Thrombo-Protective Safer Alternative to Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications
Abstract
Graphene and its derivatives have attracted significant research interest based on their application potential in different fields including biomedicine. However, recent reports from our laboratory and elsewhere have pointed to serious toxic effects of this nanomaterial on cells and organisms. Graphene oxide (GO) was found to be highly thrombogenic in mouse and evoked strong aggregatory response in human platelets. As platelets play a central role in hemostasis and thrombus formation, thrombotoxicity of GO potentially limits its biomedical applications. Surface chemistry of nanomaterials is a critical determinant of biocompatibility, and thus differentially functionalized nanomaterials exhibit varied cellular toxicity. Amine-modified carbon nanotubes have recently been shown to possess cytoprotective action, which was not exhibited by their relatively toxic carboxylated counterparts. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of amine modification of graphene on platelet reactivity. Remarkably, our results revealed for the first time that amine-modified graphene (G-NH(2)) had absolutely no stimulatory effect on human platelets nor did it induce pulmonary thromboembolism in mice following intravenous administration. Further, it did not evoke lysis of erythrocytes, another major cellular component in blood. These findings contrasted strikingly the observations with GO and reduced GO (RGO). We conclude that G-NH(2) is not endowed with thrombotoxic property unlike other commonly investigated graphene derivatives and is thus potentially safe for in vivo biomedical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Luo, J., Cote, L. J., Tung, V. C., Tan, A. T. L., Goins, P. E., Wu, J., & Huang, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1078943 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering
Goenka, S., Sant, V., & Sant, S. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.10.017 · Cited by 1,311
Nanotoxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Seabra, A. B., Paula, A. J., de Lima, R., Alves, O. L., & Durán, N. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx400385x · Cited by 893
New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Feng, L., Wu, L., & Qu, X. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201203229 · Cited by 632
Rhazouani, A., Gamrani, H., El Achaby, M., Aziz, K., Gebrati, L., Uddin, M. S., & AZIZ, F. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/5518999 · Cited by 221
CNT Induced β-Phase in Polylactide: Unique Crystallization, Biodegradation, and Biocompatibility
Singh, N. K., Singh, S. K., Dash, D., Gonugunta, P., Misra, M., & Maiti, P. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp4009042 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, S. K., Singh, M. K., Kulkarni, P. P., Sonkar, V. K., Grácio, J. J. A., & Dash, D.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-03-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2731-2740
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2043987252
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amine-Modified Graphene: Thrombo-Protective Safer Alternative to Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn300172t
- The paper
- Singh, S. K., Singh, M. K., Kulkarni, P. P., Sonkar, V. K., Grácio, J. J. A., & Dash, D. (2012). Amine-Modified Graphene: Thrombo-Protective Safer Alternative to Graphene Oxide for Biomedical Applications. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300172t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.