The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics and In Vivo Cancer Targeting Capability of Au Nanocages by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Gold nanocages have recently emerged as a novel class of photothermal transducers and drug carriers for cancer treatment. However, their pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting capability remain largely unexplored due to the lack of an imaging modality for quick and reliable mapping of their distributions in vivo. Herein, Au nanocages were prepared with controlled physicochemical properties and radiolabeled with (64)Cu in high specific activities for in vivo evaluation using positron emission tomography (PET). Our pharmacokinetic studies with femtomolar administrations suggest that 30 nm nanocages had a greatly improved biodistribution profile than 55 nm nanocages, together with higher blood retention and lower hepatic and splenic uptakes. In a murine EMT-6 breast cancer model, the small cages also showed a significantly higher level of tumor uptake and a greater tumor-to-muscle ratio than the large cages. Quantitative PET imaging confirmed rapid accumulation and retention of Au nanocages inside the tumors. The ability to directly and quickly image the distribution of Au nanocages in vivo allows us to further optimize their physicochemical properties for a range of theranostic applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drug penetration in solid tumours
Minchinton, A. I., & Tannock, I. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1893 · Cited by 2,805
Biodegradable dendritic positron-emitting nanoprobes for the noninvasive imaging of angiogenesis
Almutairi, A., Rossin, R., Shokeen, M., Hagooly, A., Ananth, A., Capoccia, B., Guillaudeu, S., Abendschein, D., Anderson, C. J., Welch, M. J., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811757106 · Cited by 235
Self-citation
Cited by
Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M., & Xia, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationComparison Study of Gold Nanohexapods, Nanorods, and Nanocages for Photothermal Cancer Treatment
Wang, Y., Black, K. C. L., Luehmann, H., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Cai, X., Wan, D., Liu, S.-Y., Li, M., Kim, P., et al. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn304332s · Cited by 615
Self-citationPiao, J.-G., Wang, L., Gao, F., You, Y.-Z., Xiong, Y., & Yang, L. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn503779d · Cited by 426
Black, K. C. L., Wang, Y., Luehmann, H. P., Cai, X., Xing, W., Pang, B., Zhao, Y., Cutler, C. S., Wang, L. V., Liu, Y., et al. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn406258m · Cited by 365
Self-citationPET-MR and SPECT-MR multimodality probes: Development and challenges
Yang, C.-T., Ghosh, K. K., Padmanabhan, P., Langer, O., Liu, J., Eng, D. N. C., Halldin, C., & Gulyás, B. (2018) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.26610 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Luehmann, H., Xia, X., Brown, P., Jarreau, C., Welch, M., & Xia, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5880-5888
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W1974206033
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics and In Vivo Cancer Targeting Capability of Au Nanocages by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn300464r
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Luehmann, H., Xia, X., Brown, P., Jarreau, C., Welch, M., & Xia, Y. (2012). Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics and In Vivo Cancer Targeting Capability of Au Nanocages by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300464r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.