The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PEGylated Nanoparticles Bind to and Alter Amyloid-Beta Peptide Conformation: Toward Engineering of Functional Nanomedicines for Alzheimer’s Disease
Abstract
We have demonstrated that the polyethylene glycol (PEG) corona of long-circulating polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) favors interaction with the amyloid-beta (Aβ(1-42)) peptide both in solution and in serum. The influence of PEGylation of poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) and poly(lactic acid) NPs on the interaction with monomeric and soluble oligomeric forms of Aβ(1-42) peptide was demonstrated by capillary electrophoresis, surface plasmon resonance, thioflavin T assay, and confocal microscopy, where the binding affected peptide aggregation kinetics. The capture of peptide by NPs in serum was also evidenced by fluorescence spectroscopy and ELISA. Moreover, in silico and modeling experiments highlighted the mode of PEG interaction with the Aβ(1-42) peptide and its conformational changes at the nanoparticle surface. Finally, Aβ(1-42) peptide binding to NPs affected neither complement activation in serum nor apolipoprotein-E (Apo-E) adsorption from the serum. These observations have crucial implications in NP safety and clearance kinetics from the blood. Apo-E deposition is of prime importance since it can also interact with the Aβ(1-42) peptide and increase the affinity of NPs for the peptide in the blood. Collectively, our results suggest that these engineered long-circulating NPs may have the ability to capture the toxic forms of the Aβ(1-42) peptide from the systemic circulation and potentially improve Alzheimer's disease condition through the proposed "sink effect".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Querfurth, H. W., & LaFerla, F. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0909142 · Cited by 4,569
apoE isoform–specific disruption of amyloid β peptide clearance from mouse brain
Deane, R., Sagare, A., Hamm, K., Parisi, M., Lane, S., Finn, M. B., Holtzman, D. M., & Zlokovic, B. V. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci36663 · Cited by 771
Soluble Aβ Inhibits Specific Signal Transduction Cascades Common to the Insulin Receptor Pathway
Townsend, M., Mehta, T., & Selkoe, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m610390200 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Nicolas, J., Mura, S., Brambilla, D., Mackiewicz, N., & Couvreur, P. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35265f · Cited by 1,270
Self-citationPolymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Beach, M. A., Nayanathara, U., Gao, Y., Zhang, C., Xiong, Y., Wang, Y., & Such, G. K. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00705 · Cited by 1,155
Pelaz, B., del Pino, P., Maffre, P., Hartmann, R., Gallego, M., Rivera-Fernández, S., de la Fuente, J. M., Nienhaus, G. U., & Parak, W. J. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01326 · Cited by 890
Agrawal, M., Saraf, S., Saraf, S., Antimisiaris, S. G., Chougule, M. B., Shoyele, S. A., & Alexander, A. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.011 · Cited by 630
Park, S. J. (2020) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s254808 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Brambilla, D., Verpillot, R., Le Droumaguet, B., Nicolas, J., Taverna, M., Kóňa, J., Lettiero, B., Hashemi, S. H., De Kimpe, L., Canovi, M., Gobbi, M., Nicolas, V., Scheper, W., Moghimi, S. M., Tvaroška, I., Couvreur, P., & Andrieux, K.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 5897-5908
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2318249462
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.