The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Fabrication of Porous Graphene Electrodes for High-Performance Energy Storage
Abstract
In the development of energy-storage devices, simultaneously achieving high power and large energy capacity at fast rate is still a great challenge. In this paper, the synergistic effect of structure and doping in the graphene is demonstrated for high-performance lithium storage with ulftrafast and long-cycling capabilities. By an in situ constructing strategy, hierarchically porous structure, highly conductive network, and heteroatom doping are ideally combined in one graphene electrode. Compared to pristine graphene, it is found that the degree of improvement with both structure and doping effects is much larger than the sum of that with only structure effect or doping effect. Benefitting from the synergistic effect of structure and doping, the novel electrodes can deliver a high-power density of 116 kW kg(-1) while the energy density remains as high as 322 Wh kg(-1) at 80 A g(-1) (only 10 s to full charge), which provides an electrochemical storage level with the power density of a supercapacitor and the energy density of a battery, bridging the gap between them. Furthermore, the optimized electrodes exhibit long-cycling capability with nearly no capacity loss for 3000 cycles and wide temperature features with high capacities ranging from -20 to 55 °C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process
Xu, Y., Sheng, K., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101187z · Cited by 3,251
Cited by
Review on recent progress of nanostructured anode materials for Li-ion batteries
Goriparti, S., Miele, E., De Angelis, F., Di Fabrizio, E., Proietti Zaccaria, R., & Capiglia, C. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103 · Cited by 2,092
Hou, J., Cao, C., Idrees, F., & Ma, X. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn506394r · Cited by 1,529
Hu, C., & Dai, L. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201604942 · Cited by 835
Heteroatom doped graphene engineering for energy storage and conversion
Kumar, R., Sahoo, S., Joanni, E., Singh, R. K., Maegawa, K., Tan, W. K., Kawamura, G., Kar, K. K., & Matsuda, A. (2020) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2020.04.010 · Cited by 681
Design Considerations for Unconventional Electrochemical Energy Storage Architectures
Vlad, A., Singh, N., Galande, C., & Ajayan, P. M. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201402115 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z.-L., Xu, D., Wang, H.-G., Wu, Z., & Zhang, X.-B.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2422-2430
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2320478799
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.