The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Smart Platform for Hyperthermia Application in Cancer Treatment: Cobalt-Doped Ferrite Nanoparticles Mineralized in Human Ferritin Cages
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles, MNPs, mineralized within a human ferritin protein cage, HFt, can represent an appealing platform to realize smart therapeutic agents for cancer treatment by drug delivery and magnetic fluid hyperthermia, MFH. However, the constraint imposed by the inner diameter of the protein shell (ca. 8 nm) prevents its use as heat mediator in MFH when the MNPs comprise pure iron oxide. In this contribution, we demonstrate how this limitation can be overcome through the controlled doping of the core with small amount of Co(II). Highly monodisperse doped iron oxide NPs with average size of 7 nm are mineralized inside a genetically modified variant of HFt, carrying several copies of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide, which has already been demonstrated to have excellent targeting properties toward melanoma cells. HFt is also conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol) molecules to increase its in vivo stability. The investigation of hyperthermic properties of HFt-NPs shows that a Co doping of 5% is enough to strongly enhance the magnetic anisotropy and thus the hyperthermic efficiency with respect to the undoped sample. In vitro tests performed on B16 melanoma cell line demonstrate a strong reduction of the cell viability after treatment with Co doped HFt-NPs and exposure to the alternating magnetic field. Clear indications of an advanced stage of apoptotic process is also observed from immunocytochemistry analysis. The obtained data suggest this system represents a promising candidate for the development of a protein-based theranostic nanoplatform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guardia, P., Di Corato, R., Lartigue, L., Wilhelm, C., Espinosa, A., Garcia-Hernandez, M., Gazeau, F., Manna, L., & Pellegrino, T. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn2048137 · Cited by 752
Cited by
Gold Nanoparticles for Photothermal Cancer Therapy
Vines, J. B., Yoon, J.-H., Ryu, N.-E., Lim, D.-J., & Park, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00167 · Cited by 906
Kandasamy, G., & Maity, D. (2015) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.058 · Cited by 422
Precise nanomedicine for intelligent therapy of cancer
Chen, H., Gu, Z., An, H., Chen, C., Chen, J., Cui, R., Chen, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-018-9397-5 · Cited by 409
Applications of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles in Biomedical Nanotechnology
Srinivasan, S. Y., Paknikar, K. M., Bodas, D., & Gajbhiye, V. (2018) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0379 · Cited by 312
Nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery
Shah, A., Aftab, S., Nisar, J., Ashiq, M. N., & Iftikhar, F. J. (2021) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102426 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Fantechi, E., Innocenti, C., Zanardelli, M., Fittipaldi, M., Falvo, E., Carbo, M., Shullani, V., Di Cesare Mannelli, L., Ghelardini, C., Ferretti, A. M., Ponti, A., Sangregorio, C., & Ceci, P.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4705-4719
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2081788608
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.