The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic a-Silicon Nanoparticle Backboned Graphene Hybrid as a Self-Compacting Anode for High-Rate Lithium Ion Batteries
Abstract
Although various Si-based graphene nanocomposites provide enhanced electrochemical performance, these candidates still yield low initial coloumbic efficiency, electrical disconnection, and fracture due to huge volume changes after extended cycles lead to severe capacity fading and increase in internal impedance. Therefore, an innovative structure to solve these problems is needed. In this study, an amorphous (a) silicon nanoparticle backboned graphene nanocomposite (a-SBG) for high-power lithium ion battery anodes was prepared. The a-SBG provides ideal electrode structures-a uniform distribution of amorphous silicon nanoparticle islands (particle size <10 nm) on both sides of graphene sheets-which address the improved kinetics and cycling stability issues of the silicon anodes. a-Si in the composite shows elastic behavior during lithium alloying and dealloying: the pristine particle size is restored after cycling, and the electrode thickness decreases during the cycles as a result of self-compacting. This noble architecture facilitates superior electrochemical performance in Li ion cells, with a specific energy of 468 W h kg(-1) and 288 W h kg(-1) under a specific power of 7 kW kg(-1) and 11 kW kg(-1), respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Cited by
Zhou, L., Zhang, K., Hu, Z., Tao, Z., Mai, L., Kang, Y., Chou, S., & Chen, J. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201701415 · Cited by 593
Surface and Interface Engineering of Silicon‐Based Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Luo, W., Chen, X., Xia, Y., Chen, M., Wang, L., Wang, Q., Li, W., & Yang, J. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201701083 · Cited by 549
Research Progress on Negative Electrodes for Practical Li‐Ion Batteries: Beyond Carbonaceous Anodes
Aravindan, V., Lee, Y., & Madhavi, S. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201402225 · Cited by 462
Research progress on silicon/carbon composite anode materials for lithium-ion battery
Shen, X., Tian, Z., Fan, R., Shao, L., Zhang, D., Cao, G., Kou, L., & Bai, Y. (2018) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2017.12.012 · Cited by 451
Kim, N., Chae, S., Ma, J., Ko, M., & Cho, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y · Cited by 434
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ko, M., Chae, S., Jeong, S., Oh, P., & Cho, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-08-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 8591-8599
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2329744268
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.