The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Localized Electric Field of Plasmonic Nanoplatform Enhanced Photodynamic Tumor Therapy
Abstract
Near-infrared plasmonic nanoparticles demonstrate great potential in disease theranostic applications. Herein a nanoplatform, composed of mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods (AuNRs), is tailor-designed to optimize the photodynamic therapy (PDT) for tumor based on the plasmonic effect. The surface plasmon resonance of AuNRs was fine-tuned to overlap with the exciton absorption of indocyanine green (ICG), a near-infrared photodynamic dye with poor photostability and low quantum yield. Such overlap greatly increases the singlet oxygen yield of incorporated ICG by maximizing the local field enhancement, and protecting the ICG molecules against photodegradation by virtue of the high absorption cross section of the AuNRs. The silica shell strongly increased ICG payload with the additional benefit of enhancing ICG photostability by facilitating the formation of ICG aggregates. As-fabricated AuNR@SiO2-ICG nanoplatform enables trimodal imaging, near-infrared fluorescence from ICG, and two-photon luminescence/photoacoustic tomography from the AuNRs. The integrated strategy significantly improved photodynamic destruction of breast tumor cells and inhibited the growth of orthotopic breast tumors in mice, with mild laser irradiation, through a synergistic effect of PDT and photothermal therapy. Our study highlights the effect of local field enhancement in PDT and demonstrates the importance of systematic design of nanoplatform to greatly enhancing the antitumor efficacy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optical Constants of the Noble Metals
Johnson, P. B., & Christy, R. W. (1972) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.6.4370 · Cited by 20,094
Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs
Wang, L. V., & Hu, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216210 · Cited by 4,331
Comparative stability studies of poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and poly(ethylene glycol) brush coatings
Pidhatika, B., Rodenstein, M., Chen, Y., Rakhmatullina, E., Mühlebach, A., Acikgöz, C., Textor, M., & Konradi, R. (2012) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1007/s13758-011-0001-y · Cited by 251
Cited by
Recent advances in nanomedicines for photodynamic therapy (PDT)-driven cancer immunotherapy
Ji, B., Wei, M., & Yang, B. (2022) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.67300 · Cited by 544
Ha, M., Kim, J.-H., You, M., Li, Q., Fan, C., & Nam, J.-M. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00234 · Cited by 466
Han, X., Huang, J., Jing, X., Yang, D., Lin, H., Wang, Z., Li, P., & Chen, Y. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b00899 · Cited by 437
Min, H., Wang, J., Qi, Y., Zhang, Y., Han, X., Xu, Y., Xu, J., Li, Y., Chen, L., Cheng, K., et al. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201808200 · Cited by 394
Self-citationMir, S. H., Nagahara, L. A., Thundat, T., Mokarian-Tabari, P., Furukawa, H., & Khosla, A. (2018) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0191808jes · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Wen, T., Zhao, R., Liu, X., Ji, T., Wang, H., Shi, X., Shi, J., Wei, J., Zhao, Y., Wu, X., & Nie, G.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-11-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 11529-11542
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2030529307
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.