The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonfilling Carbon Coating of Porous Silicon Micrometer-Sized Particles for High-Performance Lithium Battery Anodes
Abstract
Silicon is widely recognized as one of the most promising anode materials for lithium-ion batteries due to its 10 times higher specific capacity than graphite. Unfortunately, the large volume change of Si materials during their lithiation/delithiation process results in severe pulverization, loss of electrical contact, unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), and eventual capacity fading. Although there has been tremendous progress to overcome these issues through nanoscale materials design, improved volumetric capacity and reduced cost are still needed for practical application. To address these issues, we design a nonfilling carbon-coated porous silicon microparticle (nC-pSiMP). In this structure, porous silicon microparticles (pSiMPs) consist of many interconnected primary silicon nanoparticles; only the outer surface of the pSiMPs was coated with carbon, leaving the interior pore structures unfilled. Nonfilling carbon coating hinders electrolyte penetration into the nC-pSiMPs, minimizes the electrode-electrolyte contact area, and retains the internal pore space for Si expansion. SEI formation is mostly limited to the outside of the microparticles. As a result, the composite structure demonstrates excellent cycling stability with high reversible specific capacity (∼1500 mAh g(-1), 1000 cycles) at the rate of C/4. The nC-pSiMPs contain accurate void space to accommodate Si expansion while not losing packing density, which allows for a high volumetric capacity (∼1000 mAh cm(-3)). The areal capacity can reach over 3 mAh cm(-2) with the mass loading 2.01 mg cm(-2). Moreover, the production of nC-pSiMP is simple and scalable using a low-cost silicon monoxide microparticle starting material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Challenges and Recent Progress in the Development of Si Anodes for Lithium‐Ion Battery
Jin, Y., Zhu, B., Lu, Z., Liu, N., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700715 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationScalable synthesis of silicon-nanolayer-embedded graphite for high-energy lithium-ion batteries
Ko, M., Chae, S., Ma, J., Kim, N., Lee, H.-W., Cui, Y., & Cho, J. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.113 · Cited by 771
Self-citationHigh-energy lithium metal pouch cells with limited anode swelling and long stable cycles
Niu, C., Lee, H., Chen, S., Li, Q., Du, J., Xu, W., Zhang, J.-G., Whittingham, M. S., Xiao, J., & Liu, J. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0390-6 · Cited by 732
Self-citationThe emerging era of supramolecular polymeric binders in silicon anodes
Kwon, T.-W., Choi, J. W., & Coskun, A. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00858a · Cited by 560
Surface and Interface Engineering of Silicon‐Based Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Luo, W., Chen, X., Xia, Y., Chen, M., Wang, L., Wang, Q., Li, W., & Yang, J. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201701083 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Z., Liu, N., Lee, H.-W., Zhao, J., Li, W., Li, Y., & Cui, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2540-2547
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2068939997
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.