Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wetting of Mono and Few-Layered WS2 and MoS2 Films Supported on Si/SiO2 Substrates

Chow, Philippe K., Singh, Eklavya, Viana, Bartolomeu Cruz, Gao, Jian, Luo, Jian, Li, Jing, Lin, Zhong, Elías, Ana L., Shi, Yunfeng, Wang, Zuankai, Terrones, Mauricio, Koratkar, Nikhil·2015·ACS Nano

Abstract

The recent interest and excitement in graphene has also opened up a pandora's box of other two-dimensional (2D) materials and material combinations which are now beginning to come to the fore. One family of these emerging 2D materials is transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). So far there is very limited understanding on the wetting behavior of "monolayer" TMD materials. In this study, we synthesized large-area, continuous monolayer tungsten disulfide (WS2) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) films on SiO2/Si substrates by the thermal reduction and sulfurization of WO3 and MO3 thin films. The monolayer TMD films displayed an advancing water contact angle of ∼83° as compared to ∼90° for the bulk material. We also prepared bilayer and trilayer WS2 films and studied the transition of the water contact angle with increasing number of layers. The advancing water contact angle increased to ∼85° for the bilayer and then to ∼90° for the trilayer film. Beyond three layers, there was no significant change in the measured water contact angle. This type of wetting transition indicates that water interacts to some extent with the underlying silica substrate through the monolayer TMD sheet. The experimentally observed wetting transition with numbers of TMD layers lies in-between the predictions of one continuum model that considers only van der Waals attractions and another model that considers only dipole-dipole interactions. We also explored wetting as a function of aging. A clean single-layer WS2 film (without airborne contaminants) was shown to be strongly hydrophilic with an advancing water contact angle of ∼70°. However, over time, the sample ages as hydrocarbons and water present in air adsorb onto the clean WS2 sheet. After ∼7 days, the aging process is completed and the advancing water contact angle of the aged single-layer WS2 film stabilizes at ∼83°. These results suggest that clean (i.e., nonaged) monolayer TMDs are hydrophilic materials. We further show that substitution of sulfur atoms by oxygen in the lattice of aged monolayer WS2 and MoS2 films can be used to generate well-defined 'hydrophobic-hydrophilic' patterns that preferentially accumulate and create microdrop arrays on the surface during water condensation and evaporation experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn5072073

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chow, P. K., Singh, E., Viana, B. C., Gao, J., Luo, J., Li, J., Lin, Z., Elías, A. L., Shi, Y., Wang, Z., Terrones, M., & Koratkar, N.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
3023-3031
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W2144939158
Cited by
225
References
1
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.