Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Behavior of Large Doses of Ultrashort and Full-Length Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes after Oral and Intraperitoneal Administration to Swiss Mice

Kolosnjaj-Tabi, Jelena, Hartman, Keith B., Boudjemaa, Sabah, Ananta, Jeyarama S., Morgant, Georges, Szwarc, Henri, Wilson, Lon J., Moussa, Fathi·2010·ACS Nano

Abstract

Carbon nanotube (CNT) materials are of special interest as potential tools for biomedical applications. However, available toxicological data concerning single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) remain contradictory. Here, we compared the effects of SWNTs as a function of dose, length, and surface chemistry in Swiss mice. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman, near-infrared (NIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies have been used to characterize the tested materials. The dose of SWNT materials used in this study is considerably higher than that proposed for most biomedical applications, but it was deemed necessary to administer such large doses to accurately assess the toxicological impact of the materials. In an acute toxicity test, SWNTs were administered orally at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg bodyweight (b.w.). Neither death nor growth or behavioral troubles were observed. After intraperitoneal administration, SWNTs, irrespective of their length or dose (50-1000 mg/kg b.w.), can coalesce inside the body to form fiberlike structures. When structure lengths exceeded 10 mum, they irremediably induced granuloma formation. Smaller aggregates did not induce granuloma formation, but they persisted inside cells for up to 5 months after administration. Short (<300 nm) well-individualized SWNTs can escape the reticuloendothelial system to be excreted through the kidneys and bile ducts. These findings suggest that if the potential of SWNTs for medical applications is to be realized, they should be engineered into discrete, individual "molecule-like" species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nn901573w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J., Hartman, K. B., Boudjemaa, S., Ananta, J. S., Morgant, G., Szwarc, H., Wilson, L. J., & Moussa, F.
Venue
ACS Nano
Published
2010-02-22
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
1481-1492
ISSN
  • 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-086X
OpenAlex
W1975716763
Cited by
238
References
2
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.