The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative1H NMR: Development and Potential of a Method for Natural Products Analysis
Abstract
Based on a brief revision of what constitutes state-of-the-art "quantitative experimental conditions" for (1)H quantitative NMR (qHNMR), this comprehensive review contains almost 200 references and covers the literature since 1982 with emphasis on natural products. It provides an overview of the background and applications of qHNMR in natural products research, new methods such as decoupling and hyphenation, and analytical potential and limitations, and compiles information on reference materials used for and studied by qHNMR. The dual status of natural products, being single chemical entities and valuable biologically active agents that need to be purified from complex matrixes, results in an increased analytical demand when testing their deviation from the singleton composition ideal. The outcome and versatility of reported applications lead to the conclusion that qHNMR is currently the principal analytical method to meet this demand. Considering both 1D and 2D (1)H NMR experiments, qHNMR has proved to be highly suitable for the simultaneous selective recognition and quantitative determination of metabolites in complex biological matrixes. This is manifested by the prior publication of over 80 reports on applications involving the quantitation of single natural products in plant extracts, dietary materials, and materials representing different metabolic stages of (micro)organisms. In summary, qHNMR has great potential as an analytical tool in both the discovery of new bioactive natural products and the field of metabolome analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002
Newman, D. J., Cragg, G. M., & Snader, K. M. (2003) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np030096l · Cited by 3,082
Cited by
NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants
Kim, H. K., Choi, Y. H., & Verpoorte, R. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.237 · Cited by 934
Quantitative 1H NMR spectroscopy
Bharti, S. K., & Roy, R. (2012) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2012.02.007 · Cited by 799
Recent analytical approaches in quality control of traditional Chinese medicines—A review
Jiang, Y., David, B., Tu, P., & Barbin, Y. (2010) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.024 · Cited by 469
Pauli, G. F., Chen, S.-N., Simmler, C., Lankin, D. C., Gödecke, T., Jaki, B. U., Friesen, J. B., McAlpine, J. B., & Napolitano, J. G. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500734a · Cited by 398
Self-citationLewis, I. A., Schommer, S. C., Hodis, B., Robb, K. A., Tonelli, M., Westler, W. M., Sussman, M. R., & Markley, J. L. (2007) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac071583z · Cited by 278
Wekre, M. E., Hellesen Brunvoll, S., & Jordheim, M. (2022) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.3162 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauli, G. F., Jaki, B. U., & Lankin, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Natural Products
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-29
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-149
- ISSN
- 0163-3864 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6025
- OpenAlex
- W1969382003
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.