Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A “Reactive” Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Mercury Species

Santra, Mithun, Roy, Basab, Ahn, Kyo Han·2011·Organic Letters

Abstract

A ratiometric fluorescent probe for mercury species is developed based on the metal-promoted hydrolysis of a vinyl ether derivative of 2-(benzothiazol-2-yl)phenol in a buffer solution. The probe responds selectively to mercury species over various other metal ions with a marked fluorescence change from blue to cyan through the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) process. The fluorescence titration is complete with 0.5 equiv of HgCl(2), which indicates that the probe also responds to organomercury species, RHgCl.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ol2011693

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Santra, M., Roy, B., & Ahn, K. H.
Venue
Organic Letters
Published
2011-06-06
Volume
13
Issue
13
Pages
3422-3425
ISSN
  • 1523-7052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-7060
OpenAlex
W2322384091
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.