Cited by 38Molecular Sensors and Ion DetectionMercury impact and mitigation studiesLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monitoring Hg2+ and MeHg+ poisoning in living body with an activatable near-infrared II fluorescence probe

Abstract

Noninvasively imaging mercury poisoning in living organisms is critical to understanding its toxicity and treatments. Especially, simultaneous fluorescence imaging of Hg 2+ and MeHg+in vivo is helpful to disclose the mysteries of mercury poisoning. The key limitation for mercury imaging in vivo is the low imaging signal-to-background ratio (SBR) and limited imaging depth, which may result in unreliable detection results. Here, we designed and prepared a near-infrared II (NIR II) emissive probe, NIR-Rh-MS, leveraging the "spirolactam ring-open" tactic of xanthene dyes for in situ visualization of mercury toxicity in mice. The probe produces a marked fluorescence signal at 1015 nm and displays good linear responses to Hg 2+ and MeHg+ with excellent sensitivity, respectively. The penetration experiments elucidate that the activated NIR-II fluorescence signal of the probe penetrates to a depth of up to 7 mm in simulated tissues. Impressively, the probe can monitor the toxicity of Hg 2+ in mouse livers and the accumulation of MeHg+ in mouse brains via intravital NIR-II imaging for the first time. Thus, we believe that detecting Hg 2+ and MeHg+ in different organs with a single NIR-II fluorescence probe in mice would assuredly advance the toxicologic study of mercury poisoning in vivo.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130612

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wang, 2022, An activity-based fluorescent probe for imaging fluctuations of peroxynitrite (ONOO−) in the Alzheimer's disease brain, Angew Chem Int Ed, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Ye, M., Xiang, Y., Gong, J., Wang, X., Mao, Z., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Hubei University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Mao, Zhiqiang
  • Liu, Zhihong
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
445
Pages
130612
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311752065
Cited by
37
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21625503, 22174034)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2021CFB305)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Keywords
mercury toxicity, mercury(II) detection, methylmercury, spirolactam ring opening, xanthene dyes, intravital imaging, noninvasive in vivo imaging, imaging depth
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzopyrans, Coloring Agents, Fluorescent Dyes, Mercury, Mercury Poisoning, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review