Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Carbon−Lithium Electron Pair Bond in (CH3Li)n(n= 1, 2, 4)

Bickelhaupt, F. Matthias, van Eikema Hommes, Nicolaas J. R., Fonseca Guerra, Célia, Baerends, Evert Jan·1996·Organometallics

Abstract

The monomer, dimer, and tetramer of methyllithium, (CH 3 Li) n ( n = 1, 2, 4), have been studied with use of density-functional (DFT) and conventional ab initio theory. The energy gain Δ E associated with the formation of (CH 3 −Li) n from n Li • and n CH 3 • radicals is −45.5, −132.7, and −308.6 kcal/mol for n = 1, 2, and 4 using nonlocal density-functionals and a large, doubly polarized triple-ζ STO basis (NL-SCF/TZ2P). The corresponding dimerization and tetramerization energies for methyllithium are −41.7 and −126.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The 298 K heat of formation of CH 3 Li(g) is calculated to be 29.2 kcal/mol, using experimental Δ H f values for CH 3 • (g) and Li • (g). The low-energy lithium 2p orbitals are shown to play an active role in the bonding of the methyllithium aggregates and can be viewed as valence orbitals. A detailed analysis of the carbon−lithium bonding mechanism highlights the significant role of covalent contributions. In CH 3 Li, we find a strongly polar C−Li electron pair bond in which charge is donated from Li 2s to the CH 3 2a 1 SOMO. The covalent character is indicated by 2s ± 2a 1 mixing and a sizable lithium 2p z participation. In (CH 3 Li) 4 the carbon−lithium bond is provided by two distinct orbital interactions: (1) an essentially covalent electron pair bond between the strongly sp hybridized Li−Li and C−C bonding fragment orbitals of the lithium cluster and the methyl cage, respectively, in A 1 symmetry; (2) a strongly polar electron pair bond between the corresponding triply degenerate Li−Li and C−C antibonding fragment orbital sets in T 2 symmetry. The situation is similar for (CH 3 Li) 2 . The electron density is analyzed using atomic charges from the following: (1) the natural population analysis (NPA); (2) the Hirshfeld method; (3) the Mulliken method as well as a modification which we term Modified Mulliken; (4) a scheme which we designate Voronoi deformation density (VDD); the VDD charges monitor the shift of electron density out of ( Q > 0) or into ( Q < 0) the Voronoi cell of an atom upon formation of the molecule from the isolated atoms. The degree of ionicity of the carbon−lithium bond decreases from ca. “50” down to “30%” along CH 3 Li, (CH 3 Li) 2, and (CH 3 Li) 4, according to the Hirshfeld charges. This agrees with a similar trend emerging from the VDD charges as well as with the results of the electronic structure analysis. The NPA charges suggest that the carbon−lithium bond is ca. “90%” ionic and that the degree of ionicity is independent of the size of the aggregate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/om950966x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Bickelhaupt, F. M., van Eikema Hommes, N. J. R., Fonseca Guerra, C., & Baerends, E. J.
Venue
Organometallics
Published
1996-06-25
Volume
15
Issue
13
Pages
2923-2931
ISSN
  • 0276-7333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6041
OpenAlex
W2027436047
Cited by
306
References
0
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Carbon−Lithium Electron Pair Bond in (CH3Li)n(n= 1, 2, 4). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/om950966x
The paper
Bickelhaupt, F. M., van Eikema Hommes, N. J. R., Fonseca Guerra, C., & Baerends, E. J. (1996). The Carbon−Lithium Electron Pair Bond in (CH3Li)n(n= 1, 2, 4). Organometallics. https://doi.org/10.1021/om950966x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.