The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines and Cost Analysis for Catalyst Production in Biocatalytic Processes
Abstract
Biocatalysis is an emerging area of technology, and to date few reports have documented the economics of such processes. As it is a relatively new technology, many processes do not immediately fulfill the economic requirements for commercial operation. Hence, early-stage economic assessment could be a powerful tool to guide research and development activities in order to achieve commercial potential. This study discusses the cost contribution of the biocatalyst in processes that use isolated enzymes, immobilized enzymes, or whole cells to catalyze reactions leading to the production of chemicals. A methodology for rapidly estimating the production cost of the biocatalyst is presented, and examples of how the cost of the biocatalyst is affected by different parameters are given. In particular, it is seen that the fermentation yield in terms of final achievable cell concentration and expression level as well as the production scale are crucial for decreasing the total cost contribution of the biocatalyst. Moreover, it is clear that, based on initial process performance, the potential to reduce production costs by several orders of magnitude is possible. Guideline minimum productivities for a feasible process are suggested for different types of processes and products, based on typical values of biocatalyst and product costs. Such guidelines are dependent on the format of the biocatalyst (whole-cell, soluble enzyme, immobilized enzyme), as well as product market size and value. For example commodity chemicals require productivities in the range 2000−10000 kg product/kg immobilized enzyme, while pharmaceutical products only require productivities around 50−100 kg product/kg immobilized enzyme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimizing scale-up fermentation processes
Thiry, M., & Cingolani, D. (2002) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01913-3 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Role of Biocatalysis in Sustainable Chemistry
Sheldon, R. A., & Woodley, J. M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203 · Cited by 1,755
Self-citationExpanding the organic toolbox: a guide to integrating biocatalysis in synthesis
Clouthier, C. M., & Pelletier, J. N. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15286j · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Tufvesson, P., Lima-Ramos, J., Nordblad, M., & Woodley, J. M.
- Venue
- Organic Process Research & Development
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-10-20
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 266-274
- ISSN
- 1083-6160 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-586X
- OpenAlex
- W2325757558
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines and Cost Analysis for Catalyst Production in Biocatalytic Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/op1002165
- The paper
- Tufvesson, P., Lima-Ramos, J., Nordblad, M., & Woodley, J. M. (2011). Guidelines and Cost Analysis for Catalyst Production in Biocatalytic Processes. Organic Process Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1021/op1002165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.