The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoscale 3D Chiral Plasmonic Helices with Circular Dichroism at Visible Frequencies
Abstract
The nanoscaling of metamaterial structures represents a technological challenge toward their application in the optical frequency range. In this work we demonstrate tailored chiro-optical effects in plasmonic nanohelices, by a fabrication process providing a nanometer scale control on geometrical features, that leads to a fine tuning of operation band even in the visible range. Helicoidal 3D nanostructures have been prototyped by a bottom-up approach based on focused ion and electron beam induced deposition, investigating resolution limits, growth control and 3D proximity effects as a function of the interactions between writing beam and deposition environment. The fabricated arrays show chiro-optical properties at the optical frequencies and extremely high operation bandwidth tailoring dependent on the dimensional features of these 3D nanostructures: with the focused ion beam we obtained a broadband polarization selection of about 600 nm and maximum dissymmetry factor up to 40% in the near-infrared region, while with the reduced dimensions obtained by the focused electron beam a highly selective dichroic band shifted toward shorter wavelengths is obtained, with a maximum dissymmetry factor up to 26% in the visible range. A detailed finite difference time domain model highlighted the role of geometrical and compositional parameters on the optical response of fabricated nanohelices, in good agreement with experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens
Pendry, J. B. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.3966 · Cited by 12,159
Metamaterials: Optical Activity without Chirality
Plum, E., Liu, X.-X., Fedotov, V. A., Chen, Y., Tsai, D. P., & Zheludev, N. I. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.113902 · Cited by 595
Cited by
Hentschel, M., Schäferling, M., Duan, X., Giessen, H., & Liu, N. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602735 · Cited by 850
Three-dimensional nanomagnetism
Fernández-Pacheco, A., Streubel, R., Fruchart, O., Hertel, R., Fischer, P., & Cowburn, R. P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15756 · Cited by 592
Nano-kirigami with giant optical chirality
Liu, Z., Du, H., Li, J., Lu, L., Li, Z.-Y., & Fang, N. X. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat4436 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Esposito, M., Tasco, V., Cuscunà, M., Todisco, F., Benedetti, A., Tarantini, I., Giorgi, M. D., Sanvitto, D., & Passaseo, A.
- Venue
- ACS Photonics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-12-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-114
- ISSN
- 2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329076352
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.