Cited by 12,159Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchNear-Field Optical Microscopy

Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens

Open access
Pendry, J. B.·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

With a conventional lens sharpness of the image is always limited by the wavelength of light. An unconventional alternative to a lens, a slab of negative refractive index material, has the power to focus all Fourier components of a 2D image, even those that do not propagate in a radiative manner. Such "superlenses" can be realized in the microwave band with current technology. Our simulations show that a version of the lens operating at the frequency of visible light can be realized in the form of a thin slab of silver. This optical version resolves objects only a few nanometers across.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.85.3966

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The signs of permittivity and permeability determine the chirality of electromagnetic wave in optical media: the electric field, magnetic field and wave vector obey the right-handed or left-handed triad.

    “The signs of permittivity and permeability determine the chirality of electromagnetic wave in optical media: the electric field, magnetic field and the wave vector obey the right-handed or left-handed triad.”

    From Photonic simulation of topological excitations in metamaterials (2014) · cites this paper as [9]

    In the passage discussing equations (9)–(12), Pendry says that negative permittivity and permeability require a negative refractive index and a wave vector directed opposite to energy transport. Our copy does not explicitly describe the electric field, magnetic field, and wave vector as right- or left-handed triads, so it supports the underlying reversal but not the full stated formulation. The supplied copy labels this passage “Abstract” and gives no page number. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For ordinary nonmagnetic optical materials with εr > μr = 1, the electromagnetic wave obeys the right-handed rule with a positive effective mass m > 0, while double-negative or left-handed metamaterials with εr < μr < 0 have a negative mass m < 0 and obey the left-handed rule.

    “For ordinary (nonmagnetic) optical materials εr > μr = 1, the electromagnetic wave obeys the right-handed rule with a positive effective mass m > 0 while the double-negative or left-handed metamaterials with εr < μr < 09 have a negative mass m < 0 and obey the left-handed rule.”

    From Photonic simulation of topological excitations in metamaterials (2014) · cites this paper as [9]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. V. G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509 (1968).
  2. D. F. Sievenpiper, M. E. Sickmiller, and E. Yablonovitch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2480 (1996);
  3. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, W. J. Stewart, and I. Youngs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4773 (1996);
  4. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 4785 (1998).
  5. J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, and W. J. Stewart, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 47, 2075 (1999).
  6. D. R. Smith, Willie J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat- Nasser, and S. Schultz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000).
  7. R. H. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. 106, 874 (1957).
  8. T. W. Ebbesen et al., Nature (London) 391, 667 (1998).
  9. J. A. Porto, F. J. Garcia Vidal, and J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2845 (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pendry, J. B.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pendry, J. B.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-10-30
Volume
85
Issue
18
Pages
3966-3969
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2122765624
Cited by
12,159
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 189 · 2025: 305 · 2024: 352 · 2023: 355 · 2022: 456 · 2021: 486 · 2020: 462 · 2019: 558 · 2018: 565 · 2017: 576 · 2016: 634 · 2015: 607 · 2014: 622 · 2013: 667 · 2012: 758
FWCI
69.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Keywords
negative refraction, perfect lens, superlens, left-handed materials, subwavelength imaging, Fourier components, nanoscale resolution, visible light

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review