The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Euk-mPLoc: A Fusion Classifier for Large-Scale Eukaryotic Protein Subcellular Location Prediction by Incorporating Multiple Sites
Abstract
One of the critical challenges in predicting protein subcellular localization is how to deal with the case of multiple location sites. Unfortunately, so far, no efforts have been made in this regard except for the one focused on the proteins in budding yeast only. For most existing predictors, the multiple-site proteins are either excluded from consideration or assumed even not existing. Actually, proteins may simultaneously exist at, or move between, two or more different subcellular locations. For instance, according to the Swiss-Prot database (version 50.7, released 19-Sept-2006), among the 33,925 eukaryotic protein entries that have experimentally observed subcellular location annotations, 2715 have multiple location sites, meaning about 8% bearing the multiplex feature. Proteins with multiple locations or dynamic feature of this kind are particularly interesting because they may have some very special biological functions intriguing to investigators in both basic research and drug discovery. Meanwhile, according to the same Swiss-Prot database, the number of total eukaryotic protein entries (except those annotated with "fragment" or those with less than 50 amino acids) is 90,909, meaning a gap of (90,909-33,925) = 56,984 entries for which no knowledge is available about their subcellular locations. Although one can use the computational approach to predict the desired information for the blank, so far, all the existing methods for predicting eukaryotic protein subcellular localization are limited in the case of single location site only. To overcome such a barrier, a new ensemble classifier, named Euk-mPLoc, was developed that can be used to deal with the case of multiple location sites as well. Euk-mPLoc is freely accessible to the public as a Web server at http://202.120.37.186/bioinf/euk-multi. Meanwhile, to support the people working in the relevant areas, Euk-mPLoc has been used to identify all eukaryotic protein entries in the Swiss-Prot database that do not have subcellular location annotations or are annotated as being uncertain. The large-scale results thus obtained have been deposited at the same Web site via a downloadable file prepared with Microsoft Excel and named "Tab_Euk-mPLoc.xls". Furthermore, to include new entries of eukaryotic proteins and reflect the continuous development of Euk-mPLoc in both the coverage scope and prediction accuracy, we will timely update the downloadable file as well as the predictor, and keep users informed by publishing a short note in the Journal and making an announcement in the Web Page.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nakai, K., & Horton, P. (1999) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01336-x · Cited by 2,181 · cited 1×
“The predictor obtained through the above modified procedures is called Euk-mPLoc (i) that Figure 1. Schematic illustration to show the 22 subcellular locations of eukaryotic proteins: (1) acrosome, (2) cell wall, (3) centriole, (4) chloroplast, (5) cyanelle, ( 6 ) cytoplasm, (7) cytoskeleton, (8) endoplasmic reticulum…”
Cited by
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationChou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011335 · Cited by 1,157
Self-citationRecent progress in protein subcellular location prediction
Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B. (2007) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2007.07.006 · Cited by 770
Self-citationA Comprehensive Comparison of Transmembrane Domains Reveals Organelle-Specific Properties
Sharpe, H. J., Stevens, T. J., & Munro, S. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.037 · Cited by 548
Lin, H., Deng, E.-Z., Ding, H., Chen, W., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1019 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, K.-C., & Shen, H.-B.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-31
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1728-1734
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2069389043
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.