Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlinear Fitting Method for Determining Local False Discovery Rates from Decoy Database Searches

Tang, Wilfred H., Shilov, Ignat V., Seymour, Sean L.·2008·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

False discovery rate (FDR) analyses of protein and peptide identification results using decoy database searching conventionally report aggregate or global FDRs for a whole set of identifications, which are often not very informative about the error rates of individual members in the set. We describe a nonlinear curve fitting method for calculating the local FDR, which estimates the chance that an individual protein (or peptide) is incorrect, and present a simple tool that implements this analysis. The goal of this method is to offer a simple extension to the now commonplace decoy database searching, providing additional valuable information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr070492f

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Tang, W. H., Shilov, I. V., & Seymour, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2008-08-14
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
3661-3667
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1993457485
Cited by
356
References
13
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Fitting Method for Determining Local False Discovery Rates from Decoy Database Searches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr070492f
The paper
Tang, W. H., Shilov, I. V., & Seymour, S. L. (2008). Nonlinear Fitting Method for Determining Local False Discovery Rates from Decoy Database Searches. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr070492f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.