Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Need for Guidelines in Publication of Peptide and Protein Identification Data

Open access
Carr, Steven, Aebersold, Ruedi, Baldwin, Michael, Burlingame, Al, Clauser, Karl, Nesvizhskii, Alexey·2004·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Abstract

Over the past few years, the number and size of proteomic datasets composed of mass spectrometry-derived protein identifications reported in the literature have grown dramatically. This is a direct result of the widespread availability of instruments, methods, and easy-to-use software for collecting large amounts of data and for converting the observed peptide and fragment-ion masses to peptide and then protein identities. In particular, the analysis of samples containing large numbers of proteins by multidimensional liquid chromatography (LC/LC)1 coupled on-line with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is now a common component of many biological projects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.t400006-mcp200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Baldwin, M., Burlingame, A., Clauser, K., & Nesvizhskii, A.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
531-533
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110603815
Cited by
499
References
0
FWCI
30.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Need for Guidelines in Publication of Peptide and Protein Identification Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.t400006-mcp200
The paper
Carr, S., Aebersold, R., Baldwin, M., Burlingame, A., Clauser, K., & Nesvizhskii, A. (2004). The Need for Guidelines in Publication of Peptide and Protein Identification Data. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.t400006-mcp200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.