The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Trypsin Cut Before Proline?
Abstract
Trypsin is the most commonly used enzyme in mass spectrometry for protein digestion with high substrate specificity. Many peptide identification algorithms incorporate these specificity rules as filtering criteria. A generally accepted "Keil rule" is that trypsin cleaves next to arginine or lysine, but not before proline. Since this rule was derived two decades ago based on a small number of experimentally confirmed cleavages, we decided to re-examine it using 14.5 million tandem spectra (2 orders of magnitude increase in the number of observed tryptic cleavages). Our analysis revealed a surprisingly large number of cleavages before proline. We examine several hypotheses to explain these cleavages and argue that trypsin specificity rules used in peptide identification algorithms should be modified to "legitimatize" cleavages before proline. Our approach can be applied to analyze any protease, and we further argue that specificity rules for other enzymes should also be re-evaluated based on statistical evidence derived from large MS/MS data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Cited by
Barthélemy, N. R., Fenaille, F., Hirtz, C., Sergeant, N., Schraen-Maschke, S., Vialaret, J., Buée, L., Gabelle, A., Junot, C., Lehmann, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01001 · Cited by 123
Goeminne, L. E., Gevaert, K., & Clement, L. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m115.055897 · Cited by 110
Sahab, Z., Sudarshan, S. R., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Kirilyuk, A., Kamonjoh, C. M., Simic, V., Dai, Y., Byers, S. W., Doorbar, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01032-12 · Cited by 24
Trillo-Muyo, S., Dolan, B., Svensson, F., Vickers, T. J., Arike, L., García-Bonete, M.-J., Gustafsson, J. K., Nielsen, M. I., Wandall, H. H., Fleckenstein, J. M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68037-0 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez, J., Gupta, N., Smith, R. D., & Pevzner, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 300-305
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2043972629
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.