The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body Fluid Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery: Lessons from the Past Hold the Key to Success in the Future
Abstract
Sparked by the article from Lescuyer and colleagues in a recent issue, we aim here to further encourage interest in and discussion of clinically relevant biomarker research. We express our view on proteomics for biomarker discovery by addressing multiple relevant issues, including the inherent differences between biological fluids (and how these differences affect current analytical approaches) and experimental design to maximize the efficiency of moving from the bench to the bedside. Herein, we also include suggestions for definition of the term "biomarker", based on the use of a set of universal characterization/validation requirements, and illustrate several recent examples of successful transitions of benchtop proteomic studies work to clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Vaisar, T., Pennathur, S., Green, P. S., Gharib, S. A., Hoofnagle, A. N., Cheung, M. C., Byun, J., Vuletic, S., Kassim, S., Singh, P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci26206 · Cited by 942
Cited by
Exosomes in bodily fluids are a highly stable resource of disease biomarkers
Boukouris, S., & Mathivanan, S. (2015) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201400114 · Cited by 586
Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics
Mischak, H., Allmaier, G., Apweiler, R., Attwood, T., Baumann, M., Benigni, A., Bennett, S. E., Bischoff, R., Bongcam-Rudloff, E., Capasso, G., et al. (2010) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001249 · Cited by 334
Self-citationRaman spectroscopy: an evolving technique for live cell studies
Smith, R., Wright, K. L., & Ashton, L. (2016) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c6an00152a · Cited by 285
Quantitative Urinary Proteome Analysis for Biomarker Evaluation in Chronic Kidney Disease
Jantos-Siwy, J., Schiffer, E., Brand, K., Schumann, G., Rossing, K., Delles, C., Mischak, H., & Metzger, J. (2009) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr800401m · Cited by 259
Self-citationMischak, H., Coon, J. J., Novak, J., Weissinger, E. M., Schanstra, J. P., & Dominiczak, A. F. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20205 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Good, D. M., Thongboonkerd, V., Novak, J., Bascands, J.-L., Schanstra, J. P., Coon, J. J., Dominiczak, A., & Mischak, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-10-31
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4549-4555
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2070642086
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body Fluid Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery: Lessons from the Past Hold the Key to Success in the Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr070529w
- The paper
- Good, D. M., Thongboonkerd, V., Novak, J., Bascands, J.-L., Schanstra, J. P., Coon, J. J., Dominiczak, A., & Mischak, H. (2007). Body Fluid Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery: Lessons from the Past Hold the Key to Success in the Future. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr070529w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
