The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila
Abstract
Salinity is a major abiotic stress affecting plant cultivation and productivity. Thellungiella halophila is a halophyte and has been used as a model for studying plant salt tolerance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance will facilitate the generation of salt tolerant crops. Here we report comparative leaf proteomics of Arabidopsis, a glycophyte, and its close relative Thellungiella, a halophyte, under different salt stress conditions. Proteins from control and NaCl treated Arabidopsis and Thellungiella leaf samples were extracted and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A total of 88 protein spots from Arabidopsis gels and 37 protein spots from Thellungiella gels showed significant changes. Out of these spots, a total of 79 and 32 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella, respectively. Most of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and stress response in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella. As a complementary approach, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) LC-MS was used to identify crude microsomal proteins. A total of 31 and 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella under salt treatment, respectively. Overall, there were more proteins changed in abundance in Arabidopsis than in Thellungiella. Distinct patterns of protein changes in the two species were observed. Collectively, this work represents the most extensive proteomic description of salinity responses of Arabidopsis and Thellungiella and has improved our knowledge of salt tolerance in glycophytes and halophytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
Cited by
Gupta, B., & Huang, B. (2014) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2014/701596 · Cited by 2,105
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2011) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 · Cited by 852
Mechanisms of Plant Salt Response: Insights from Proteomics
Zhang, H., Han, B., Wang, T., Chen, S., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Dai, S. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200861w · Cited by 377
Self-citationPlant Abiotic Stress Proteomics: The Major Factors Determining Alterations in Cellular Proteome
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Urban, M. O., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00122 · Cited by 375
Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance
Zhang, J.-L., & Shi, H. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9813-6 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, Q., Chen, S., Dai, S., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Yan, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-04-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2584-2599
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2070662527
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.