The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Impact of Chimera MS/MS Spectra on Peptide Identification in Large-Scale Proteomics Studies
Open accessAbstract
A complicating factor for protein identification within complex mixtures by LC/MS/MS is the problem of "chimera" spectra, where two or more precursor ions with similar mass and retention time are co-sequenced by MS/MS. Chimera spectra show reduced scores due to unidentifiable fragment ions derived from contaminating parents. However, the extent of chimeras in LC/MS/MS data sets and their impact on protein identification workflows are incompletely understood. We report ChimeraCounter, a software program which detects chimeras in data sets collected on an Orbitrap/LTQ instrument. Evaluation of synthetic chimeras created from pairs of well-defined peptide MS/MS spectra reveal that chimeras reduce database search scores most significantly when contaminating fragment ion intensities exceed 20% of the targeted fragment ion intensities. In large-scale data sets, the identification rate for chimera MS/MS is 2-fold lower compared to nonchimera spectra. Importantly, this occurs in a manner which depends not on absolute precursor ion intensity, but on intensity relative to the median precursor intensity distribution. We further show that chimeras reduce the number of accepted peptide identifications by increasing false negatives while showing little increase in false positives. The results provide a framework for identifying chimeras and characterizing their contribution to the poorly understood false negative class of MS/MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Absolute Quantification of Proteins by LCMSE
Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G.-Z., Vissers, J. P. C., & Geromanos, S. J. (2006) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500230-mcp200 · Cited by 1,529
Assigning Significance to Peptides Identified by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Decoy Databases
Käll, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., & Noble, W. S. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr700600n · Cited by 607
Cited by
Meier, F., Beck, S., Grassl, N., Lubeck, M., Park, M. A., Raether, O., & Mann, M. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932 · Cited by 423
Frankenfield, A. M., Ni, J., Ahmed, M., & Hao, L. (2022) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00145 · Cited by 321
Multiplexed and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling
Chapman, J. D., Goodlett, D. R., & Masselon, C. D. (2014) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21400 · Cited by 259
Ting, Y. S., Egertson, J. D., Payne, S. H., Kim, S., MacLean, B., Käll, L., Aebersold, R., Smith, R. D., Noble, W. S., & MacCoss, M. J. (2015) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o114.047035 · Cited by 175
JUMP: a tag-based database search tool for peptide identification with high sensitivity and accuracy
Wang, X., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, H., Tan, H., & Peng, J. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o114.039586 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Houel, S., Abernathy, R., Renganathan, K., Meyer-Arendt, K., Ahn, N. G., & Old, W. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4152-4160
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2035024343
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Impact of Chimera MS/MS Spectra on Peptide Identification in Large-Scale Proteomics Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr1003856
- The paper
- Houel, S., Abernathy, R., Renganathan, K., Meyer-Arendt, K., Ahn, N. G., & Old, W. M. (2010). Quantifying the Impact of Chimera MS/MS Spectra on Peptide Identification in Large-Scale Proteomics Studies. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr1003856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.