Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiplexed and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling

Chapman, John D., Goodlett, David R., Masselon, Christophe D.·2014·Mass Spectrometry Reviews

Abstract

One of the most important early developments in the field of proteomics was the advent of automated data acquisition routines that allowed high‐throughput unattended data acquisition during HPLC introduction of peptide mixtures to a tandem mass spectrometer. Prior to this, data acquisition was orders of magnitude less efficient being based entirely on lists of predetermined ions generated in a prior HPLC‐MS experiment. This process, known generically as data‐dependent analysis, empowered the development of shotgun proteomics where hundreds to thousands of peptide sequences are matched per experiment. In their most popular implementation, the most abundant ionized species from every precursor ion scan at each moment in chromatographic time are successively selected for isolation, activation and tandem mass analysis. While extremely powerful, this strategy has one primary limitation in that detectable dynamic range is restricted (in a top‐down manner) to the peptides that ionize the best. To circumvent the serial nature of the data‐dependent process and increase detectable dynamic range, the concepts of multiplexed and data‐independent acquisition (DIA) have emerged. Multiplexed‐data acquisition is based on more efficient co‐selection and co‐dissociation of multiple precursor ions in parallel, the data from which is subsequently de‐convoluted to provide polypeptide sequences for each individual precursor ion. DIA has similar goals, but there is no real‐time ion selection based on prior precursor ion scans. Instead, predefined m/z ranges are interrogated either by fragmenting all ions entering the mass spectrometer at every single point in chromatographic time; or by dividing the m/z range into smaller m/z ranges for isolation and fragmentation. These approaches aim to fully utilize the capabilities of mass spectrometers to maximize tandem MS acquisition time and to address the need to expand the detectable dynamic range, lower the limit of detection, and improve the overall confidence of peptide identifications and relative protein quantification measurements. This review covers all aspects of multiplexed‐ and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics, from experimental implementations to advances in software for data interpretation. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 33: 452–470, 2014.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mas.21400

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, J. D., Goodlett, D. R., & Masselon, C. D.
Venue
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-26
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
452-470
ISSN
  • 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2787
OpenAlex
W1803908051
Cited by
259
References
69
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplexed and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.21400
The paper
Chapman, J. D., Goodlett, D. R., & Masselon, C. D. (2014). Multiplexed and data‐independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21400

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.