Cited by 337Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

On the Development of Plasma Protein Biomarkers

Open access
Surinova, Silvia, Schiess, Ralph, Hüttenhain, Ruth, Cerciello, Ferdinando, Wollscheid, Bernd, Aebersold, Ruedi·2011·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

The development of plasma biomarkers has proven to be more challenging than initially anticipated. Many studies have reported lists of candidate proteins rather than validated candidate markers with an assigned performance to a specific clinical objective. Biomarker research necessitates a clear rational framework with requirements on a multitude of levels. On the technological front, the platform needs to be effective to detect low abundant plasma proteins and be able to measure them in a high throughput manner over a large amount of samples reproducibly. At a conceptual level, the choice of the technological platform and available samples should be part of an overall clinical study design that depends on a joint effort between basic and clinical research. Solutions to these needs are likely to facilitate more feasible studies. Targeted proteomic workflows based on SRM mass spectrometry show the potential of fast verification of biomarker candidates in plasma and thereby closing the gap between discovery and validation in the biomarker development pipeline. Biological samples need to be carefully chosen based on well-established guidelines either for candidate discovery in the form of disease models with optimal fidelity to human disease or for candidate evaluation as well-designed and annotated clinical cohort groups. Most importantly, they should be representative of the target population and directly address the investigated clinical question. A conceptual structure of a biomarker study can be provided in the form of several sequential phases, each having clear objectives and predefined goals. Furthermore, guidelines for reporting the outcome of biomarker studies are critical to adequately assess the quality of the research, interpretation and generalization of the results. By being attentive to and applying these considerations, biomarker research should become more efficient and lead to directly translatable biomarker candidates into clinical evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr1008515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Development of a clinically approved noninvasive biomarker assay from initial discovery is a long, difficult, and uncertain process.

    “the development of such a test, from initial biomarker discovery to a clinically approved biomarker assay is a long, difficult, and uncertain process [22]”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [22]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surinova, S., Schiess, R., Hüttenhain, R., Cerciello, F., Wollscheid, B., & Aebersold, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Aebersold, Ruedi
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2011-01-07
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
5-16
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1965920802
Cited by
334
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 45
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Keywords
plasma biomarkers, biomarker development, targeted proteomics, multiple reaction monitoring, biomarker validation, clinical research design, sample selection, disease models
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Proteins, Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review