The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicted Effector Molecules in the Salivary Secretome of the Pea Aphid ( Acyrthosiphon pisum ): A Dual Transcriptomic/Proteomic Approach
Abstract
The relationship between aphids and their host plants is thought to be functionally analogous to plant-pathogen interactions. Although virulence effector proteins that mediate plant defenses are well-characterized for pathogens such as bacteria, oomycetes, and nematodes, equivalent molecules in aphids and other phloem-feeders are poorly understood. A dual transcriptomic-proteomic approach was adopted to generate a catalog of candidate effector proteins from the salivary glands of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Of the 1557 transcript supported and 925 mass spectrometry identified proteins, over 300 proteins were identified with secretion signals, including proteins that had previously been identified directly from the secreted saliva. Almost half of the identified proteins have no homologue outside aphids and are of unknown function. Many of the genes encoding the putative effector proteins appear to be evolving at a faster rate than homologues in other insects, and there is strong evidence that genes with multiple copies in the genome are under positive selection. Many of the candidate aphid effector proteins were previously characterized in typical phytopathogenic organisms (e.g., nematodes and fungi) and our results highlight remarkable similarities in the saliva from plant-feeding nematodes and aphids that may indicate the evolution of common solutions to the plant-parasitic lifestyle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Comparative Functional Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster Proteomes
Schrimpf, S. P., Weiss, M., Reiter, L., Ahrens, C. H., Jovanovic, M., Malmström, J., Brunner, E., Mohanty, S., Lercher, M. J., Hunziker, P. E., et al. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000048 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Silencing of Aphid Genes by dsRNA Feeding from Plants
Pitino, M., Coleman, A. D., Maffei, M. E., Ridout, C. J., & Hogenhout, S. A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025709 · Cited by 414
Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Interactions With Aphids
Goggin, F. L., & Fischer, H. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.811105 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Carolan, J. C., Caragea, D., Reardon, K. T., Mutti, N. S., Dittmer, N., Pappan, K., Cui, F., Castaneto, M., Poulain, J., Dossat, C., Tagu, D., Reese, J. C., Reeck, G. R., Wilkinson, T. L., & Edwards, O. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1505-1518
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2085201572
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.