Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Panorama: A Targeted Proteomics Knowledge Base

Open access
Sharma, Vagisha, Eckels, Josh, Taylor, Greg K., Shulman, Nicholas J., Stergachis, Andrew B., Joyner, Shannon A., Yan, Ping, Whiteaker, Jeffrey R., Halusa, Goran N., Schilling, Birgit, Gibson, Bradford W., Colangelo, Christopher M., Paulovich, Amanda G., Carr, Steven A., Jaffe, Jacob D., MacCoss, Michael J., MacLean, Brendan·2014·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Panorama is a web application for storing, sharing, analyzing, and reusing targeted assays created and refined with Skyline,1 an increasingly popular Windows client software tool for targeted proteomics experiments. Panorama allows laboratories to store and organize curated results contained in Skyline documents with fine-grained permissions, which facilitates distributed collaboration and secure sharing of published and unpublished data via a web-browser interface. It is fully integrated with the Skyline workflow and supports publishing a document directly to a Panorama server from the Skyline user interface. Panorama captures the complete Skyline document information content in a relational database schema. Curated results published to Panorama can be aggregated and exported as chromatogram libraries. These libraries can be used in Skyline to pick optimal targets in new experiments and to validate peak identification of target peptides. Panorama is open-source and freely available. It is distributed as part of LabKey Server,2 an open source biomedical research data management system. Laboratories and organizations can set up Panorama locally by downloading and installing the software on their own servers. They can also request freely hosted projects on https://panoramaweb.org , a Panorama server maintained by the Department of Genome Sciences at the University of Washington.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr5006636

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, V., Eckels, J., Taylor, G. K., Shulman, N. J., Stergachis, A. B., Joyner, S. A., Yan, P., Whiteaker, J. R., Halusa, G. N., Schilling, B., Gibson, B. W., Colangelo, C. M., Paulovich, A. G., Carr, S. A., Jaffe, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., & MacLean, B.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2014-08-18
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
4205-4210
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1995403127
Cited by
223
References
5
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.