The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in the Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation
Abstract
Phosphorylation is one of the most relevant and ubiquitous post-translational modifications. Despite its relevance, the analysis of protein phosphorylation has been revealed as one of the most challenging tasks due to its highly dynamic nature and low stoichiometry. However, the development and introduction of new analytical methods are modifying rapidly and substantially this field. Especially important has been the introduction of more sensitive and specific methods for phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide purification as well as the use of more sensitive and accurate MS-based analytical methods. The integration of both approaches has enabled large-scale phosphoproteome studies to be performed, an unimaginable task few years ago. Additionally, methods originally developed for differential proteomics have been adapted making the study of the highly dynamic nature of protein phosphorylation feasible. This review aims at offering an overview on the most frequently used methods in phosphoprotein and phosphopeptide enrichment as well as on the most recent MS-based analysis strategies. Current strategies for quantitative phosphoproteomics and the study of the dynamics of protein phosphorylation are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC
Mann, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2067 · Cited by 931
Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases
Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S.-H., & Zhou, H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701622104 · Cited by 404
Cited by
Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry: Approaches, Advances, and Applications
Yates, J. R., Ruse, C. I., & Nakorchevsky, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124934 · Cited by 1,078
SLC6 Neurotransmitter Transporters: Structure, Function, and Regulation
Kristensen, A. S., Andersen, J., Jørgensen, T. N., Sørensen, L., Eriksen, J., Loland, C. J., Strømgaard, K., & Gether, U. (2011) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.108.000869 · Cited by 864
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., & Heck, A. J. R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1599 · Cited by 362
Du, T., Niu, X., Hou, S., Li, Z., Li, P., & Fan, Y. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36747 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Paradela, A., & Albar, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1809-1818
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W1997091955
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.