Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Pore Structure on Performance of An Activated-Carbon Supercapacitor Electrode Recycled from Scrap Waste Tires

Zhi, Mingjia, Yang, Feng, Meng, Fanke, Li, Minqi, Manivannan, Ayyakkannu, Wu, Nianqiang·2014·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
DOI 10.1021/sc500336h
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It is important to address the challenges posed with the ever-increasing demand for energy supply and environmental sustainability. Activated carbon, which is the common material for commercial supercapacitor electrodes, is currently derived from petroleum-based precursors. This paper presents an effective synthetic method that utilizes waste tires as the precursor to prepare the activated carbon electrodes by the pyrolysis and chemical activation processes. Adjusting the activation parameters can tailor multiple physical properties of the resulting activated carbon, which in turns tunes the performance of the activated carbon electrode. Statistical multiple linear regression and stepwise regression methods are employed to investigate the dependence of the specific capacitance and the rate capability upon the physical properties (such as porosity) of the activated carbon electrode. The specific capacitance of activated carbon electrode is controlled by the micropore volume but independent of the mesopores volume. The rate capability is dominated by the mesopore/micropore volume ratio instead of the absolute value of mesopore volume.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/sc500336h

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. He X., 2013, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 9440, 10.1039/c3ta10501f · doi:10.1039/c3ta10501f
  2. Raymundo-Pinero E., 2013, Carbon, 61, 278, 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.005 · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.005
  3. Rufford T. E., 2009, Electrochem. Commun., 11, 974, 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.038 · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.038
  4. Fung P. P. M., 2012, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 20, 497, 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60211-5 · doi:10.1016/s1004-9541(11)60211-5
  5. Roussak O. V., 2013, Applied Chemistry, 10.1007/978-1-4614-4262-2 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4262-2
  6. Burke A., 2006, Ultracapacitor technology: present and future performance and applications
  7. Suuberg E. M., 2007, Carbon, 45, 1719, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.05.012 · DOI
  8. Helleur R., 2001, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 58, 813, 10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00207-2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Zhi, M., Yang, F., Meng, F., Li, M., Manivannan, A., & Wu, N.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2014-06-16
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
1592-1598
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1021/sc500336h
OpenAlex
W2319068013
Cited by
359
References
25
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.