Overview of GCxGC tier alpha combustor operability prescreening method for sustainable aviation fuel candidates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
UD predictions leverage a database of 1226 molecules and their associated properties.
“UD predictions [32] leverage a database of 1226 molecules and their associated properties.”
From Sustainable aviation fuel prescreening tools and procedures (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable aviation fuel prescreening tools and procedures
Heyne, J., Rauch, B., Le Clercq, P., & Colket, M. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120004 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Yang, Z., & Heyne, J.
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-09-08
- OpenAlex
- W4251882834
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Keywords
- sustainable aviation fuel, comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography, fuel compatibility, combustion testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
